Suppr超能文献

Interpretation of the disk diffusion susceptibility test for amikacin: report of a collaborative study.

作者信息

Washington J A, Yu P K, Gavan T L, Schoenknecht F D, Thornsberry C

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Mar;15(3):400-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.3.400.

Abstract

Because excessively high rates of false resistance have been encountered with the 10-mug amikacin disk in diffusion susceptibility tests, a study was performed to examine existing zone diameter interpretative criteria and to compare the accuracy of 10- and 30-mug amikacin disks by the error rate-bounded classification scheme. Although current zone diameter interpretative criteria eliminate false susceptibles, there is an unacceptably high rate of false resistants. This problem can be resolved in most instances by revising the zone diameter interpretative criteria for the 10-mug disk (resistant, </=9 mm; indeterminate, 10 to 11 mm; susceptible, >/=12 mm) or, preferably, by replacing the 10-mug disk with a 30-mug disk and adopting new interpretative criteria (resistant, </=14 mm; indeterminate, 15 to 16 mm; susceptible, >/=17 mm). Because of significant differences in performance among media, it is necessary to include Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 among controls routinely tested and to exclude from use lots of Mueller-Hinton agar yielding results outside the 75% tolerance (90% confidence) limits for amikacin.

摘要

相似文献

1
Interpretation of the disk diffusion susceptibility test for amikacin: report of a collaborative study.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Mar;15(3):400-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.3.400.
5
Interpretive standards for disk susceptibility tests with Sch 21420 and amikacin.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Oct;18(4):616-21. doi: 10.1128/AAC.18.4.616.
6
In vitro antibacterial activity of amikacin, a new aminoglycoside, against clinical bacterial isolates from children.
J Clin Pharmacol. 1975 Apr;15(4 Pt 1):246-51. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1975.tb01444.x.
7
High-content aminoglycoside disks for determining aminoglycoside-penicillin synergy against Enterococcus faecalis.
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Feb;26(2):257-60. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.2.257-260.1988.
8
Laboratory evaluation of amikacin susceptibility testing by the AutoBac I system.
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Mar;9(3):397-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.3.397-398.1979.
10
Wide variability in Pseudomonas aeruginosa aminoglycoside results among seven susceptibility testing procedures.
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Oct;27(10):2277-85. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2277-2285.1989.

本文引用的文献

1
Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to gentamicin and related aminoglycoside antibiotics.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Sep;6(3):253-62. doi: 10.1128/AAC.6.3.253.
4
Susceptibility tests of anaerobic bacteria: statistical and clinical considerations.
J Infect Dis. 1974 Dec;130(6):588-94. doi: 10.1093/infdis/130.6.588.
5
Resistance to gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin among clinical isolates of bacteria.
Am J Med. 1977 Jun;62(6):873-81. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(77)90655-6.
7
Uniformity in sensitivity test media.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1978 Jan;4(1):4-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/4.1.4.
9
Significance of antimicrobial synergism for the outcome of gram negative sepsis.
Am J Med Sci. 1977 Mar-Apr;273(2):157-67. doi: 10.1097/00000441-197703000-00005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验