Bender J F, Schimpff S C, Young V M, Fortner C L, Brouillet M D, Love L J, Wiernik P H
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Mar;15(3):455-60. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.3.455.
A total of 38 adult patients with acute leukemia who were undergoing remission induction chemotherapy in regular patient rooms were randomly allocated to one of two oral nonabsorbable antibiotic regimens for infection prophylaxis (gentamicin, vancomycin, and nystatin [GVN] or gentamicin and nystatin [GN]) to evaluate whether vancomycin was a necessary component. The patient population in both groups were comparable. Tolerance to GVN was less than GN but compliance was approximately equal (>85% in both groups). Patients receiving vancomycin demonstrated greater overall alimentary tract microbial suppression; however, acquisition of potential pathogens was approximately equal in both groups. The incidence of bacteremia, as well as the overall incidence of infection as related to the number of days at various granulocyte levels, was also approximately equal in both groups. Group D Streptococcus species were poorly suppressed by GN compared with GVN, although no patient developed an infection with these organisms. Colonization by newly acquired gram-negative bacilli was significantly less in the GN group (GN, 3 colonizations; GVN, 13 colonizations; P < 0.01). It is concluded that vancomycin may be safely eliminated from the GVN regimen provided microbiological data is monitored to detect resistant organisms.
共有38名在普通病房接受缓解诱导化疗的成年急性白血病患者被随机分配到两种口服非吸收性抗生素预防感染方案之一(庆大霉素、万古霉素和制霉菌素[GVN]或庆大霉素和制霉菌素[GN]),以评估万古霉素是否为必需成分。两组患者人群具有可比性。GVN的耐受性低于GN,但依从性大致相同(两组均>85%)。接受万古霉素治疗的患者总体消化道微生物抑制作用更强;然而,两组中潜在病原体的获得情况大致相同。两组的菌血症发生率以及与不同粒细胞水平天数相关的总体感染发生率也大致相同。与GVN相比,GN对D群链球菌的抑制作用较差,尽管没有患者感染这些微生物。GN组新获得的革兰氏阴性杆菌定植明显较少(GN,3次定植;GVN,13次定植;P<0.01)。得出的结论是,如果监测微生物数据以检测耐药菌,则可从GVN方案中安全去除万古霉素。