Stark E, Flitcraft A, Frazier W
Int J Health Serv. 1979;9(3):461-93. doi: 10.2190/KTLU-CCU7-BMNQ-V2KY.
Our objectives are to describe the pattern of abuse associated with battering and to evaluate the contribution of the medical system and of broader social forces to its emergence. A pilot study of 481 women who used the emergency service of a large metropolitan hospital in the U.S. shows that battering includes a history of self-abuse and psychosocial problems, as well as repeated and escalating physical injury. In addition, although the number of battered women using the service is 10 times higher than medical personnel identify, the pattern of abuse that constitutes battering emerges only after its initial effects are presented and in conjunction with specific medical intervnetions and referrals. Examination of intervention and referral patterns suggests a staging process by which battering is socially constructed. At first, the physical trauma associated with abuse is medicated symptomatically. But the patient's persistence, the failure of the cure, and the incongruity between her problems and available medical explanations lead the provider to label the abused woman in ways that suggest she is personally responsible for her victimization. Although secondary problems such as depression, drug abuse, suicide attempts, or alcoholism derive as much from the intervention strategy adopted as from physical assault or psychopathology, they are treated as the primary problems at psychiatric and social service referral points where family maintenance is often the therapeutic goal. One consequence of this referral strategy is the stabilization of "violent families" in ways that virtually insure women will be abused in systematic and arbitrary ways. The use of patriarchal logic by medical providers ostensibly responding to physical trauma has less to do with individual "sexism" than with the political and economic constraints under which medicine operates as part of an "extended patriarchy." Medicine's role in battering suggests that the services function to reconstitute the "private" world of patriarchal authority, with violence if necessary, against demands to socialize the labors of love.
我们的目标是描述与殴打相关的虐待模式,并评估医疗系统和更广泛的社会力量对其产生的影响。一项针对481名使用美国一家大型都市医院急诊服务的女性的试点研究表明,殴打行为包括自残史和心理社会问题,以及反复且不断升级的身体伤害。此外,尽管使用该服务的受虐妇女数量比医务人员识别出的高出10倍,但构成殴打的虐待模式只有在其最初影响显现后,并与特定的医疗干预和转诊相结合时才会出现。对干预和转诊模式的研究表明,殴打行为是通过一个分阶段过程在社会层面构建起来的。起初,与虐待相关的身体创伤会得到对症治疗。但患者的持续存在、治疗的失败,以及她的问题与现有的医学解释之间的不一致,导致医疗人员以暗示她对自己的受害负有个人责任的方式给受虐妇女贴上标签。尽管诸如抑郁、药物滥用、自杀未遂或酗酒等继发性问题,与所采取的干预策略以及身体攻击或精神病理学一样,都源于这些问题,但在以家庭维持往往是治疗目标的精神病学和社会服务转诊点,它们却被视为主要问题。这种转诊策略的一个后果是“暴力家庭”得以稳定,这实际上确保了女性会以系统且随意的方式受到虐待。表面上应对身体创伤的医疗人员使用父权逻辑,与其说是个人的“性别歧视”,不如说是医学作为“扩展父权制”一部分运作时所面临的政治和经济限制。医学在殴打行为中的作用表明其服务功能是重构父权权威的“私人”世界,如有必要还会使用暴力,以对抗将爱的劳动社会化的要求。