Ireland J F, Kahn M W
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1979 Spring;25(1):1-3. doi: 10.1177/002076407902500101.
If a measure of intelligence is culturally biased it is assumed that disadvantaged individuals will score lower on it than on a less biased instrument. The Cattell purports to be "culture fair" and it was compared to the WISC with a delinquent juvenile population, controlling for both order effects and individual administration. The results reveal consistently lower mean I.Q. scores for the Cattell under all conditions. The Cattell appears to be a more difficult test for this population. It is concluded that considerable caution should be exercised inusing the Cattell as a culture fair method of I.Q. evaluation with underprivileged delinquent youth.
如果一种智力测量方法存在文化偏见,那么可以假定,弱势群体在该测量方法上的得分会低于在偏见较小的测量工具上的得分。卡特尔测试声称是“文化公平”的,并且将其与韦氏儿童智力量表针对少年犯罪人群进行了比较,同时控制了顺序效应和个体施测。结果显示,在所有条件下,卡特尔测试的平均智商得分始终较低。对于这一人群而言,卡特尔测试似乎是一项难度更大的测试。得出的结论是,在将卡特尔测试用作对贫困少年犯罪青年进行智商评估的文化公平方法时,应格外谨慎。