Lawless H T
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1979 Jun;93(3):538-47. doi: 10.1037/h0077582.
Three lines of evidence from psychophysical experiments implied that mutual suppression of bitter and sweet tastes is due to neural inhibition rather than chemical interactions in solution or competition of molecules for common receptor sites. Removal of sweetness from bittersweet mixtures caused the bitterness to increase. This was accomplished by adaptation to sucrose or by treatment with Gymnema sylvestre, neither of which affect the concentration of sucrose on the tongue. Such increases in the bitterness of mixtures, independent of the concentration of the sweet masking substance, are difficult to reconcile with suppression by means of chemical interactions. Similar dependence of suppression on perceived intensity (and independence from concentration) was observed with mixtures of phyenylthiocarbamide and sucrose. Tasters of phenylthiocarbamide showed stronger suppression of sweetness than nontasters. This result was also inconsistent with molecular interactions causing suppression, which would have resulted in the same degree of suppression for the two groups. Instead, these findings support neural explanations of mixture suppression, such as antidromic inhibition or occlusion.
来自心理物理学实验的三条证据表明,苦味和甜味之间的相互抑制是由于神经抑制,而非溶液中的化学相互作用或分子对共同受体位点的竞争。从苦甜混合物中去除甜味会导致苦味增加。这可通过对蔗糖适应或用匙羹藤处理来实现,这两种方法均不影响舌头上蔗糖的浓度。混合物苦味的这种增加,与甜味掩盖物质的浓度无关,很难用化学相互作用引起的抑制来解释。在用苯基硫脲和蔗糖的混合物中也观察到类似的抑制对感知强度的依赖性(以及与浓度无关)。苯基硫脲品尝者对甜味的抑制比非品尝者更强。这一结果也与导致抑制的分子相互作用不一致,分子相互作用本应导致两组的抑制程度相同。相反,这些发现支持了对混合物抑制的神经学解释,如逆向抑制或阻塞。