• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用味觉诱发电位研究人类对蔗糖、阿斯巴甜和甜菊糖的味觉差异反应。

Differential Cerebral Gustatory Responses to Sucrose, Aspartame, and Stevia Using Gustatory Evoked Potentials in Humans.

机构信息

Centre des Sciences du goût et de l'Alimentation, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000 Dijon, France.

CHU Dijon - Bourgogne - Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology - 14, Rue Paul Gaffarel, F-21000 Dijon, France.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2020 Jan 27;12(2):322. doi: 10.3390/nu12020322.

DOI:10.3390/nu12020322
PMID:32012665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7071252/
Abstract

Aspartame and Stevia are widely substituted for sugar. Little is known about cerebral activation in response to low-caloric sweeteners in comparison with high-caloric sugar, whereas these molecules lead to different metabolic effects. We aimed to compare gustatory evoked potentials (GEPs) obtained in response to sucrose solution in young, healthy subjects, with GEPs obtained in response to aspartame and Stevia. Twenty healthy volunteers were randomly stimulated with three solutions of similar intensities of sweetness: Sucrose 10 g/100 mL of water, aspartame 0.05 g/100 mL, and Stevia 0.03 g/100 mL. GEPs were recorded with EEG (Electroencephalogram) electrodes. Hedonic values of each solution were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS). The main result was that P1 latencies of GEPs were significantly shorter when subjects were stimulated by the sucrose solution than when they were stimulated by either the aspartame or the Stevia one. P1 latencies were also significantly shorter when subjects were stimulated by the aspartame solution than the Stevia one. No significant correlation was noted between GEP parameters and hedonic values marked by VAS. Although sucrose, aspartame, and Stevia lead to the same taste perception, cerebral activation by these three sweet solutions are different according to GEPs recording. Besides differences of taste receptors and cerebral areas activated by these substances, neural plasticity, and change in synaptic connections related to sweet innate preference and sweet conditioning, could be the best hypothesis to explain the differences in cerebral gustatory processing after sucrose and sweeteners activation.

摘要

阿斯巴甜和甜菊糖被广泛替代糖。与高热量的糖相比,人们对低热量甜味剂引起的大脑激活知之甚少,而这些分子会产生不同的代谢效应。我们旨在比较年轻健康受试者对蔗糖溶液、阿斯巴甜和甜菊糖的味觉诱发电位(GEP)。20 名健康志愿者被随机用三种甜度相似的溶液刺激:蔗糖 10g/100ml 水、阿斯巴甜 0.05g/100ml 和甜菊糖 0.03g/100ml。用脑电图(EEG)电极记录 GEP。用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估每种溶液的愉悦值。主要结果是,当受试者被蔗糖溶液刺激时,GEP 的 P1 潜伏期明显短于被阿斯巴甜或甜菊糖溶液刺激时。当受试者被阿斯巴甜溶液刺激时,P1 潜伏期也明显短于被甜菊糖溶液刺激时。GEP 参数与 VAS 标记的愉悦值之间没有显著相关性。尽管蔗糖、阿斯巴甜和甜菊糖会产生相同的味觉感知,但根据 GEP 记录,这些三种甜味溶液的大脑激活是不同的。除了这些物质的味觉受体和激活的大脑区域的差异外,与先天甜味偏好和甜味条件反射相关的神经可塑性和突触连接的变化,可能是解释蔗糖和甜味剂激活后大脑味觉处理差异的最佳假设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94a/7071252/88f026cdd84b/nutrients-12-00322-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94a/7071252/f8a7bb695b57/nutrients-12-00322-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94a/7071252/93ebd0f9776e/nutrients-12-00322-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94a/7071252/88f026cdd84b/nutrients-12-00322-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94a/7071252/f8a7bb695b57/nutrients-12-00322-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94a/7071252/93ebd0f9776e/nutrients-12-00322-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94a/7071252/88f026cdd84b/nutrients-12-00322-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Differential Cerebral Gustatory Responses to Sucrose, Aspartame, and Stevia Using Gustatory Evoked Potentials in Humans.利用味觉诱发电位研究人类对蔗糖、阿斯巴甜和甜菊糖的味觉差异反应。
Nutrients. 2020 Jan 27;12(2):322. doi: 10.3390/nu12020322.
2
Taste Perception and Cerebral Activity in the Human Gustatory Cortex Induced by Glucose, Fructose, and Sucrose Solutions.人类味觉皮质中葡萄糖、果糖和蔗糖溶液引起的味觉感知和大脑活动。
Chem Senses. 2019 Sep 7;44(7):435-447. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjz034.
3
Preference for Sucrose Solutions Modulates Taste Cortical Activity in Humans.对蔗糖溶液的偏好调节人类味觉皮层活动。
Chem Senses. 2016 Sep;41(7):591-9. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjw063. Epub 2016 May 27.
4
Temporal sweetness and side tastes profiles of 16 sweeteners using temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA).使用时间性全选(TCATA)评估 16 种甜味剂的时间甜味和副味特征。
Food Res Int. 2019 Jul;121:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
5
Effects of stevia, aspartame, and sucrose on food intake, satiety, and postprandial glucose and insulin levels.甜菊糖、阿斯巴甜和蔗糖对食物摄入、饱腹感以及餐后血糖和胰岛素水平的影响。
Appetite. 2010 Aug;55(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.03.009. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
6
Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) comparison of taste profiles for different sweeteners in black tea, chocolate milk, and natural yogurt.不同甜味剂在红茶、巧克力牛奶和原味酸奶中味觉特征的 RATA 比较。
J Food Sci. 2020 Feb;85(2):486-492. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15007. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
Cerebral gustatory activation in response to free fatty acids using gustatory evoked potentials in humans.利用味觉诱发电位研究人类对游离脂肪酸的味觉激活。
J Lipid Res. 2019 Mar;60(3):661-670. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M086587. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
8
Influence of Package Visual Cues of Sweeteners on the Sensory-Emotional Profiles of Their Products.甜味剂包装视觉线索对其产品感官-情感特征的影响。
J Food Sci. 2017 Feb;82(2):500-508. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13610. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
9
Measurement of the relative sweetness of stevia extract, aspartame and cyclamate/saccharin blend as compared to sucrose at different concentrations.测量甜叶菊提取物、阿斯巴甜和甜蜜素/糖精混合物在不同浓度下与蔗糖相比的相对甜度。
Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1999;54(2):119-30. doi: 10.1023/a:1008134420339.
10
A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners.16 种甜味剂的心理物理剂量反应行为比较。
Nutrients. 2018 Nov 2;10(11):1632. doi: 10.3390/nu10111632.

引用本文的文献

1
EEG-Based Analysis of Neural Responses to Sweeteners: Effects of Type and Concentration.基于脑电图的甜味剂神经反应分析:类型和浓度的影响
Foods. 2025 Jul 14;14(14):2460. doi: 10.3390/foods14142460.
2
[Development and application of gustatory evoked potentiometer].[味觉诱发电位仪的研制与应用]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Mar;39(3):276-280. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2025.03.018.
3
Prolonged latency of the gustatory evoked potentials for sucrose solution in subjects living with obesity compared with normal-weight subjects.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Stevia Extract on Postprandial Glucose Response, Satiety and Energy Intake: A Three-Arm Crossover Trial.甜菊提取物对餐后血糖反应、饱腹感和能量摄入的影响:一项三臂交叉试验。
Nutrients. 2019 Dec 12;11(12):3036. doi: 10.3390/nu11123036.
2
Taste Perception and Cerebral Activity in the Human Gustatory Cortex Induced by Glucose, Fructose, and Sucrose Solutions.人类味觉皮质中葡萄糖、果糖和蔗糖溶液引起的味觉感知和大脑活动。
Chem Senses. 2019 Sep 7;44(7):435-447. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjz034.
3
Low-Dose Stevia (Rebaudioside A) Consumption Perturbs Gut Microbiota and the Mesolimbic Dopamine Reward System.
肥胖受试者的味觉诱发电位对蔗糖溶液的潜伏期长于体重正常的受试者。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Dec;48(12):1720-1727. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01607-2. Epub 2024 Aug 25.
4
Time-frequency analysis of gustatory event related potentials (gERP) in taste disorders.味觉事件相关电位(gERP)在味觉障碍中的时频分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):2512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52986-5.
5
Exploratory Research on Sweetness Perception: Decision Trees to Study Electroencephalographic Data and Its Relationship with the Explicit Response to Sweet Odor, Taste, and Flavor.甜味感知的探索性研究:使用决策树研究脑电图数据及其与对甜味气味、味道和风味的显性反应的关系。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 8;22(18):6787. doi: 10.3390/s22186787.
6
The convolutional neural network as a tool to classify electroencephalography data resulting from the consumption of juice sweetened with caloric or non-caloric sweeteners.卷积神经网络作为一种工具,用于对饮用含热量或不含热量甜味剂的果汁后产生的脑电图数据进行分类。
Front Nutr. 2022 Jul 19;9:901333. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.901333. eCollection 2022.
低剂量甜菊糖(莱鲍迪苷 A)摄入会扰乱肠道微生物群和中脑边缘多巴胺奖励系统。
Nutrients. 2019 May 31;11(6):1248. doi: 10.3390/nu11061248.
4
Cerebral gustatory activation in response to free fatty acids using gustatory evoked potentials in humans.利用味觉诱发电位研究人类对游离脂肪酸的味觉激活。
J Lipid Res. 2019 Mar;60(3):661-670. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M086587. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
5
EEG discrimination of perceptually similar tastes.基于脑电的可感知相似味觉的区分。
J Neurosci Res. 2019 Mar;97(3):241-252. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24281. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
6
Stevia Leaf to Stevia Sweetener: Exploring Its Science, Benefits, and Future Potential.甜菊叶到甜菊糖:探索其科学、益处和未来潜力。
J Nutr. 2018 Jul 1;148(7):1186S-1205S. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy102.
7
Revisiting the safety of aspartame.重新审视阿斯巴甜的安全性。
Nutr Rev. 2017 Sep 1;75(9):718-730. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux035.
8
Biological fate of low-calorie sweeteners.低热量甜味剂的生物学归宿。
Nutr Rev. 2016 Nov;74(11):670-689. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuw032.
9
Preference for Sucrose Solutions Modulates Taste Cortical Activity in Humans.对蔗糖溶液的偏好调节人类味觉皮层活动。
Chem Senses. 2016 Sep;41(7):591-9. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjw063. Epub 2016 May 27.
10
Synthesis of rebaudioside A from stevioside and their interaction model with hTAS2R4 bitter taste receptor.从甜菊糖苷合成莱鲍迪苷A及其与hTAS2R4苦味受体的相互作用模型
Phytochemistry. 2016 May;125:106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 11.