Suppr超能文献

利用味觉诱发电位研究人类对蔗糖、阿斯巴甜和甜菊糖的味觉差异反应。

Differential Cerebral Gustatory Responses to Sucrose, Aspartame, and Stevia Using Gustatory Evoked Potentials in Humans.

机构信息

Centre des Sciences du goût et de l'Alimentation, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000 Dijon, France.

CHU Dijon - Bourgogne - Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology - 14, Rue Paul Gaffarel, F-21000 Dijon, France.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2020 Jan 27;12(2):322. doi: 10.3390/nu12020322.

Abstract

Aspartame and Stevia are widely substituted for sugar. Little is known about cerebral activation in response to low-caloric sweeteners in comparison with high-caloric sugar, whereas these molecules lead to different metabolic effects. We aimed to compare gustatory evoked potentials (GEPs) obtained in response to sucrose solution in young, healthy subjects, with GEPs obtained in response to aspartame and Stevia. Twenty healthy volunteers were randomly stimulated with three solutions of similar intensities of sweetness: Sucrose 10 g/100 mL of water, aspartame 0.05 g/100 mL, and Stevia 0.03 g/100 mL. GEPs were recorded with EEG (Electroencephalogram) electrodes. Hedonic values of each solution were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS). The main result was that P1 latencies of GEPs were significantly shorter when subjects were stimulated by the sucrose solution than when they were stimulated by either the aspartame or the Stevia one. P1 latencies were also significantly shorter when subjects were stimulated by the aspartame solution than the Stevia one. No significant correlation was noted between GEP parameters and hedonic values marked by VAS. Although sucrose, aspartame, and Stevia lead to the same taste perception, cerebral activation by these three sweet solutions are different according to GEPs recording. Besides differences of taste receptors and cerebral areas activated by these substances, neural plasticity, and change in synaptic connections related to sweet innate preference and sweet conditioning, could be the best hypothesis to explain the differences in cerebral gustatory processing after sucrose and sweeteners activation.

摘要

阿斯巴甜和甜菊糖被广泛替代糖。与高热量的糖相比,人们对低热量甜味剂引起的大脑激活知之甚少,而这些分子会产生不同的代谢效应。我们旨在比较年轻健康受试者对蔗糖溶液、阿斯巴甜和甜菊糖的味觉诱发电位(GEP)。20 名健康志愿者被随机用三种甜度相似的溶液刺激:蔗糖 10g/100ml 水、阿斯巴甜 0.05g/100ml 和甜菊糖 0.03g/100ml。用脑电图(EEG)电极记录 GEP。用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估每种溶液的愉悦值。主要结果是,当受试者被蔗糖溶液刺激时,GEP 的 P1 潜伏期明显短于被阿斯巴甜或甜菊糖溶液刺激时。当受试者被阿斯巴甜溶液刺激时,P1 潜伏期也明显短于被甜菊糖溶液刺激时。GEP 参数与 VAS 标记的愉悦值之间没有显著相关性。尽管蔗糖、阿斯巴甜和甜菊糖会产生相同的味觉感知,但根据 GEP 记录,这些三种甜味溶液的大脑激活是不同的。除了这些物质的味觉受体和激活的大脑区域的差异外,与先天甜味偏好和甜味条件反射相关的神经可塑性和突触连接的变化,可能是解释蔗糖和甜味剂激活后大脑味觉处理差异的最佳假设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94a/7071252/f8a7bb695b57/nutrients-12-00322-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验