Saravay S M
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1975;23(1):69-89. doi: 10.1177/000306517502300104.
It has been my aim in this paper to revise the existing psychoanalytic theory of group psychology in accordance with current structural concepts. The need for fundamental revision in the existing theory of group organization is demonstrated by its restriction to an oedipal paradigm, which cannot account for the regression to an oral paradigm of group organization during group formation. Freud's explanation of regression in crowds is reviewed. The limitations inherent in Freud's topographic and narcisistic models are demonstrated; irreconcilable contradictions are shown to exist between the two theories. A structural model of group psychology that is free from internal contradictions and provides a unifying explanation for both regression and merging in the crowd is developed. As a consequence of these revisions it is possible to conceptualize preoedipal organizations of group structure in addition to the oedipal paradigm proposed by Freud.
在本文中，我的目标是根据当前的结构概念来修订现有的群体心理学精神分析理论。现有群体组织理论局限于俄狄浦斯范式，无法解释群体形成过程中向群体组织口欲范式的退行，这表明对该理论进行根本性修订的必要性。回顾了弗洛伊德对群体中退行的解释。论证了弗洛伊德地形学和自恋模型所固有的局限性；表明这两种理论之间存在无法调和的矛盾。构建了一个没有内在矛盾的群体心理学结构模型，该模型为群体中的退行和融合提供了统一的解释。由于这些修订，除了弗洛伊德提出的俄狄浦斯范式外，还能够对群体结构的前俄狄浦斯组织进行概念化。
