Pansa M
Br J Med Psychol. 1979 Jun;52(2):175-82. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1979.tb02511.x.
Sixteen process and 16 reactive schizoprenics out-patients were compared on a verbal conditioning task in an alternating conditioning-extinction design, using verbal and non-verbal positive social reinforcement to influence the emission of self-referred affect statements. It was found that process subjects failed to condition during the time periods used, while reactives demonstrated a significant trials effect showing trends consistent with those hypothesized from the type of design used. This differential conditionability between groups was shown not to be a function of diagnosis, sex, motivation, severity of illness, medication, hospitalization history, or general speech output. It was concluded that the degree of social responsiveness manifested in the premorbid history of the two groups is also operative in behaviour during the psychotic period, specifically, in responsiveness to positive social reinforcers in a verbal conditioning task.
在一项交替条件作用-消退设计的言语条件作用任务中,对16名病程性精神分裂症门诊患者和16名反应性精神分裂症门诊患者进行了比较,使用言语和非言语积极社会强化来影响自我提及情感陈述的发出。结果发现,病程性患者在所用时间段内未能形成条件反射,而反应性患者表现出显著的试验效应,显示出与所用设计类型所假设的趋势一致的趋势。两组之间这种不同的条件可形成性并非诊断、性别、动机、疾病严重程度、药物治疗、住院史或一般言语输出的函数。得出的结论是,两组病前史中表现出的社会反应程度在精神病期的行为中也起作用,具体而言,在言语条件作用任务中对积极社会强化物的反应中起作用。