Stolz R, Battegay R, Mall-Haefeli M, Rauchfleisch U
Schweiz Arch Neurol Neurochir Psychiatr. 1979;124(2):351-69.
In a comparative catamnestic study the emotional working-through of sterilisation in 3 groups of 33 women was examined (duration of catamnesis: 10-12, 5, 2 years). Whereas in all the 3 collectives the upper lower class (according to Bolte) is represented the most frequently (58% in the 1st and the 2nd, 52% in the 3rd), as far as the lower middle class is concerned there is a higher fraction in the 3rd collective (p less than 0,05) and of the middle class there is a higher fraction in the collectives 1 and 2 (p less than 0,05). Women with a higher income (p less than 0,01) and with a better school and professional (p less than 0,05) training are overrepresented in the 2nd and 3rd collective. In the 3rd group only 6% indicated a religious bond, in comparison to 55% in the 1st and 49% in the 2nd group (p less than 0,01). Women of the 2nd and the 3rd collective were in comparison to those of the 1st group older (p less than 0,01) when they were sterilised, and had less children (p less than 0,05-0,01). In the 3rd group there were more divorced women (18%) in comparison to 3% in the 2nd and 0% in the 1st group (p less than 0,01). Concerning the indication for sterilisation medical-psychiatric causes were preponderant with 42% in the 1st group in comparison to 24% in the 2nd and 18% in the 3rd group (p less than 0,01), whereas in the 2nd group (61%) the social indications were predominant. The immediate cause for sterilisation was represented in the 2nd and the 3rd collective preponderantly by the desire to replace the hormonal contraceptives (p less than 0,01). The 1st collective mainly used insecure contraceptive methods before the operation, the 2nd and 3rd principally hormonal methods (p less than 0,01). In the 1st group it was mainly the insecurity of the method, in the 2nd and the 3rd there were more frequent side effects or contraindications (p less than 0,01), which caused the dissatisfaction with the anticonceptive method. The 3 groups differed significantly concerning the catamnestic evaluation of sterilisation. 100% of the last, 94% each of the 2nd and 3rd were satisfied concerning the sterilisation. To the question of working-through of sterilisation concerning psychic, somatic and especially sexual effects, most of the women in all the 3 groups responded favourably.
在一项回顾性比较研究中,对3组各33名女性绝育后的情绪疏导情况进行了调查(随访时长分别为10 - 12年、5年、2年)。在所有这3组人群中,(按照博尔特的分类)上中阶层出现的频率最高(第1组和第2组为58%,第3组为52%);就下中阶层而言,第3组的占比更高(p < 0.05),而中阶层在第1组和第2组中的占比更高(p < 0.05)。收入较高(p < 0.01)、接受过更好的学校教育和职业培训(p < 0.05)的女性在第2组和第3组中占比过高。在第3组中,只有6%的女性表示有宗教信仰,相比之下,第1组为55%,第2组为49%(p < 0.01)。与第1组的女性相比,第2组和第3组的女性在绝育时年龄更大(p < 0.01),孩子数量更少(p < 0.05 - 0.01)。第3组中的离婚女性更多(18%),相比之下,第2组为3%,第1组为0%(p < 0.01)。关于绝育的指征,第1组中医疗 - 精神方面的原因占主导,为42%,相比之下,第2组为24%,第3组为18%(p < 0.01),而在第2组中(61%)社会指征占主导。在第2组和第3组中,绝育的直接原因主要是想要停用激素避孕药(p < 0.01)。第1组在手术前主要使用不可靠的避孕方法,第2组和第3组主要使用激素方法(p < 0.01)。在第1组中,主要是方法不可靠,而在第2组和第3组中,副作用或禁忌情况更频繁出现(p < 0.01),这导致了对避孕方法的不满。这3组在绝育的随访评估方面有显著差异。第1组中100%对绝育感到满意,第2组和第3组各有94%感到满意。对于绝育在心理、身体尤其是性方面影响的情绪疏导问题,所有3组中的大多数女性都给出了积极的回应。