Suppr超能文献

时间误差对聋儿言语清晰度的影响。

The effect of timing errors on the intelligibility of deaf children's speech.

作者信息

Osberger M J, Levitt H

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1979 Nov;66(5):1316-24. doi: 10.1121/1.383552.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of timing errors on the intelligibility of deaf children's speech. Deviant timing patterns were corrected in the recorded speech samples of six deaf children using digital speech processing techniques. The speech waveform was modified to correct timing errors only, leaving all other aspects of the speech unchanged. The following six-stage approximation procedure was used to correct the deviant timing patterns: (1) original, unaltered utterances, (2) correction of pauses only, (3) correction of relative timing, (4) correction of absolute syllable duration, (5) correction of relative timing and pauses, and (6) correction of absolute syllable duration and pauses. Measures of speech intelligibility were obtained for the original and the computer-modified utterances. On the average, the highest intelligibility score was obtained when relative timing errors only were corrected. The correction of this type of error improved the intelligibility of both stressed and unstressed words within a phrase. Improvements in word intelligibility, which occurred when relative timing was corrected, appeared to be closely related to the number of phonemic errors present within a word. The second highest intelligibility score was obtained for the original, unaltered sentences. On the average, the intelligibility scores obtained for the other four forms of timing modification were poorer than those obtained for the original sentences. Thus, the data show that intelligibility improved, on the average, when only one type of error, relative timing, was corrected.

摘要

本研究的目的是量化时间误差对聋儿语音清晰度的影响。使用数字语音处理技术对六名聋儿的录音语音样本中的异常时间模式进行校正。语音波形仅被修改以校正时间误差,语音的所有其他方面保持不变。采用以下六阶段近似程序来校正异常时间模式:(1) 原始的、未改变的话语;(2) 仅校正停顿;(3) 校正相对时间;(4) 校正绝对音节时长;(5) 校正相对时间和停顿;(6) 校正绝对音节时长和停顿。获取了原始话语和计算机修改话语的语音清晰度测量值。平均而言,仅校正相对时间误差时获得的清晰度得分最高。这种类型的误差校正提高了短语中重读和非重读音节的清晰度。校正相对时间时出现的单词清晰度提高似乎与单词中存在的音素错误数量密切相关。原始的、未改变的句子获得了第二高的清晰度得分。平均而言,其他四种时间修改形式获得的清晰度得分比原始句子的得分差。因此,数据表明,平均而言,仅校正一种类型的误差,即相对时间时,清晰度会提高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验