Maurer Y A
Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol. 1979 Sep;12(5):366-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1094632.
Patients suffering from acute schizophrenia are subjected to treatment according to different therapy standards, depending on the individual hospital. Hence, the present study aimed at a comparative investigation of the effects and side effects of fluphenazine dihydrochloride administered to 51 acutely diseased schizophrenics via the intravenous, intramuscular and oral routes. It was also interesting to record the assessment of efficacy, painfulness and, as the case may be, repeated selection of the form of application concerned, by the patients themselves. Finally, we also investigated the relations between the age of the patients, duration of previous hospitalisation, and the effects achieved with the three application forms. Documentation was effected via the following examination instruments described and recommended by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), USA; CGI, BPRS, Dotes, APDI and PTR.
根据不同医院的情况,患有急性精神分裂症的患者会按照不同的治疗标准接受治疗。因此,本研究旨在对51名急性发病的精神分裂症患者通过静脉注射、肌肉注射和口服途径给予盐酸氟奋乃静的效果和副作用进行比较研究。记录患者自身对疗效、疼痛程度以及在必要时对相关应用形式的重复选择的评估也很有意思。最后,我们还研究了患者年龄、既往住院时间与三种应用形式所取得的效果之间的关系。通过美国国立精神卫生研究所(NIMH)描述和推荐的以下检查工具进行记录:CGI、BPRS、Dotes、APDI和PTR。