Warren C E, Allen M, Haefner J W
Behav Sci. 1979 Sep;24(5):296-310. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830240503.
The continued expansion and fragmentation of biological disciplines impede education, communication, and efficient advance of biological research. Reversing these trends may require a unification of theories and concepts from all levels of biological organization. One form of this unification is the statement of generalizations that apply to all living systems. We explore the philosophical foundations of general theories of living systems by analyzing conceptual frameworks as they apply to biology. This analysis examines the relation of empirical observation, theories, and conceptual frameworks within the context of an individual scientist's conceptual continuum. Also presented are a small set of translevel generalizations that articulate our conceptual framework of living systems in terms of organismic system organization, the environmental system-organismic system dyad, system capacity, and system incorporation. A set of procedural rules are stated which suggest minimum criteria for the evaluation of the explanatory adequacy of biological theories. The relation of this work to other similar analyses and syntheses of biological knowledge is discussed.
生物学科的持续扩张和碎片化阻碍了生物学教育、交流以及生物研究的高效推进。扭转这些趋势可能需要将生物组织各个层面的理论和概念统一起来。这种统一的一种形式是陈述适用于所有生命系统的一般性结论。我们通过分析应用于生物学的概念框架来探索生命系统一般理论的哲学基础。该分析在个体科学家的概念连续体背景下审视经验观察、理论和概念框架之间的关系。还提出了一小部分跨层次的一般性结论,这些结论从机体系统组织、环境系统 - 机体系统二元组、系统能力和系统整合等方面阐述了我们的生命系统概念框架。阐述了一套程序规则,这些规则为评估生物学理论的解释充分性提出了最低标准。讨论了这项工作与其他类似的生物学知识分析和综合之间的关系。