• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过G抗体和M抗体对小鼠进行被动保护以抵抗腹腔注射的霍乱弧菌。

Passive protection of mice against intraperitoneally injected Vibrio cholerae by G and M antibody.

作者信息

Pike R M, Chandler C H

出版信息

Infect Immun. 1971 Nov;4(5):589-92. doi: 10.1128/iai.4.5.589-592.1971.

DOI:10.1128/iai.4.5.589-592.1971
PMID:5154896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC416357/
Abstract

Fractions of rabbit anti-Vibrio cholerae serum containing gammaG antibodies were compared with fractions containing gammaM antibodies for their ability to protect mice against lethal infection resulting from the intraperitoneal injection of organisms suspended in mucin. About twice as much gammaG as gammaM (estimated by quantitative precipitation) was required to protect against approximately 1,000 50% lethal doses when the antibody was given intraperitoneally 4 hr before challenge. When protective serum fractions were given subcutaneously, however, the amount of gammaM required to protect was increased about 40-fold, whereas gammaG was about equally effective subcutaneously and intraperitoneally.

摘要

将含有γG抗体的兔抗霍乱弧菌血清组分与含有γM抗体的组分进行比较,观察它们保护小鼠抵抗腹腔注射黏蛋白悬液中霍乱弧菌所致致死性感染的能力。当在攻击前4小时腹腔注射抗体时,保护小鼠抵抗约1000个50%致死剂量所需的γG约为γM的两倍(通过定量沉淀法估算)。然而,当皮下注射保护性血清组分时,保护所需的γM量增加约40倍,而γG皮下注射和腹腔注射的效果大致相同。

相似文献

1
Passive protection of mice against intraperitoneally injected Vibrio cholerae by G and M antibody.通过G抗体和M抗体对小鼠进行被动保护以抵抗腹腔注射的霍乱弧菌。
Infect Immun. 1971 Nov;4(5):589-92. doi: 10.1128/iai.4.5.589-592.1971.
2
Agglutinating and bactericidal properties of fractions of rabbit anti-Vibrio cholerae serum.兔抗霍乱弧菌血清各组分的凝集和杀菌特性
J Bacteriol. 1969 Jun;98(3):956-62. doi: 10.1128/jb.98.3.956-962.1969.
3
Immunity to Vibrio cholerae in the mouse. I. Passive protection of newborn mice.小鼠对霍乱弧菌的免疫力。I. 新生小鼠的被动保护
Infect Immun. 1972 Apr;5(4):428-32. doi: 10.1128/iai.5.4.428-432.1972.
4
Analysis of the roles of antilipopolysaccharide and anti-cholera toxin immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies in protection against Vibrio cholerae and cholera toxin by use of monoclonal IgA antibodies in vivo.利用单克隆免疫球蛋白A(IgA)抗体在体内分析抗脂多糖和抗霍乱毒素IgA抗体在抵御霍乱弧菌和霍乱毒素中的作用。
Infect Immun. 1993 Dec;61(12):5279-85. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.12.5279-5285.1993.
5
Experimental studies on cholera immunization. 4. The antibody response to formalinized Vibrio cholerae and purified endotoxin with special reference to protective capacity.霍乱免疫的实验研究。4. 针对甲醛处理的霍乱弧菌和纯化内毒素的抗体反应,特别提及保护能力。
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1975;49(4):434-52.
6
Cholera toxin modulates the systemic immune responses against Vibrio cholerae surface antigens after repeated inoculations.霍乱毒素在反复接种后可调节针对霍乱弧菌表面抗原的全身免疫反应。
Microbiol Immunol. 2006;50(8):607-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2006.tb03835.x.
7
Virulence factors involved in the intraperitoneal infection of adult mice with Vibrio cholerae.霍乱弧菌对成年小鼠腹腔感染所涉及的毒力因子。
Infect Immun. 1976 Feb;13(2):457-63. doi: 10.1128/iai.13.2.457-463.1976.
8
Prophylactic significance of the nonlipopolysaccharide antigens of Vibrio cholerae.霍乱弧菌非脂多糖抗原的预防意义
J Infect Dis. 1983 Nov;148(5):931-9. doi: 10.1093/infdis/148.5.931.
9
Colonization of the rabbit small intestine by clinical and environmental isolates of non-O1 Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio mimicus.非O1群霍乱弧菌和拟态弧菌的临床及环境分离株在兔小肠的定殖
Infect Immun. 1983 Sep;41(3):1175-83. doi: 10.1128/iai.41.3.1175-1183.1983.
10
Specific antibodies to cholera toxin in rabbit milk are protective against Vibrio cholerae-induced intestinal secretion.兔奶中针对霍乱毒素的特异性抗体可预防霍乱弧菌引起的肠道分泌。
Immunology. 1987 Aug;61(4):543-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Immunity to Vibrio cholerae in the mouse. II. Effect of a cell-adherent immune factor.小鼠对霍乱弧菌的免疫力。II. 细胞黏附免疫因子的作用。
Infect Immun. 1973 Jan;7(1):35-8. doi: 10.1128/iai.7.1.35-38.1973.

本文引用的文献

1
Brucella-Agglutinating Antibodies: Relation of Mercaptoethanol Stability to Complement Fixation.布氏菌凝集抗体:巯基乙醇稳定性与补体结合的关系。
Science. 1964 Mar 20;143(3612):1334-5. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3612.1334.
2
Serological Properties of gammaG and gammaM Antibodies to the Somatic Antigen of Vibrio cholerae During the Course of Immunization of Rabbits.在兔体免疫过程中对霍乱弧菌菌体抗原的γG 和 γM 抗体的血清学特性。
Infect Immun. 1971 Jun;3(6):803-9. doi: 10.1128/iai.3.6.803-809.1971.
3
Effect of Purified Rabbit Anti-Salmonella typhimurium Antibodies on the Fate of Intravenously Injected Bacteria.纯化兔抗鼠伤寒沙门氏菌抗体对静脉注射细菌命运的影响。
Infect Immun. 1971 Jan;3(1):154-8. doi: 10.1128/iai.3.1.154-158.1971.
4
Biological Activities of Rabbit Immunoglobulin M and Immunoglobulin G Antibodies to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.兔抗铜绿假单胞菌免疫球蛋白 M 和免疫球蛋白 G 抗体的生物学活性。
Infect Immun. 1970 Oct;2(4):453-61. doi: 10.1128/iai.2.4.453-461.1970.
5
THE ISOLATION AND BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES OF RABBIT GAMMA M- AND GAMMA G-ANTI-SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM ANTIBODIES.兔γM和γG抗鼠伤寒沙门氏菌抗体的分离及生物学活性
J Exp Med. 1965 Aug 1;122(2):385-402. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.2.385.
6
SOME ASPECTS OF THE ANTIBODY RESPONSE OF RABBITS TO IMMUNIZATION WITH ENTEROBACTERIAL SOMATIC ANTIGENS.兔对肠杆菌菌体抗原免疫的抗体反应的某些方面
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1964 Jul;116:832-7. doi: 10.3181/00379727-116-29386.
7
STUDIES ON THE IMMUNE GLOBULINS OF HUMAN SERUM. II. A STUDY OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF ANTI-BRUCELLA AND ANTI-DIPHTHERIA ANTIBODY ACTIVITIES AMONG GAMMA-SS, GAMMA-IM AND GAMMA-1A-GLOBULIN FRACTIONS.人血清免疫球蛋白研究。II. 抗布鲁氏菌和抗白喉抗体活性在γ-SS、γ-IM和γ-1A球蛋白组分中的分布研究。
J Immunol. 1963 Jul;91:11-7.
8
Metabolic heterogeneity of human gamma-globulin.人γ-球蛋白的代谢异质性
Biochem J. 1960 Sep;76(3):475-87. doi: 10.1042/bj0760475.
9
Comparison of the opsonic activity of gamma-G- and gamma-M-anti-Proteus globulins.γ-G-和γ-M-抗变形杆菌球蛋白调理活性的比较。
J Immunol. 1967 Feb;98(2):336-43.
10
Agglutinating and precipitating capacity of rabbit anti-Salmonella typhosa gamma G and gamma M-antibodies during prolonged immunization.兔抗伤寒沙门氏菌γG和γM抗体在长期免疫过程中的凝集和沉淀能力
J Bacteriol. 1966 Oct;92(4):880-6. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.4.880-886.1966.