Rafky D M
Adolescence. 1979 Fall;14(55):451-64.
Pathanalysis is applied to survey data bearing on Arthur Stinchcombe's model of student rebellion. The linear causal model hypothesizes that school rebellion is due directly to expressive alienation and indirectly to strain in three systems: poor articulation regarding status allocation, claims to cultural symbols of adult rights, and unrealizable internal standards. Support for the model is not obtained. An alternate model is tested and verified in which political efficacy is an important antecedent of school disruption. The major implication is that school rebellion is not a response to the school experience itself. Other findings are presented concerning the scalability of school disruption items, the nature of expressive alienation and its components, and the impact of sex, race, and neighborhood on school rebellion.
路径分析应用于与亚瑟·斯廷科姆的学生反叛模型相关的调查数据。线性因果模型假设,学校反叛直接归因于表达性疏离,间接归因于三个系统中的压力:地位分配方面的表达不畅、对成人权利文化象征的主张以及无法实现的内部标准。该模型未得到支持。一个替代模型经过测试并得到验证,其中政治效能是学校混乱的一个重要先行因素。主要的启示是,学校反叛并非对学校经历本身的反应。还呈现了关于学校混乱项目的可扩展性、表达性疏离的性质及其组成部分,以及性别、种族和邻里关系对学校反叛的影响等其他研究结果。