Calvano N J, Berger R E
Med Sci Sports. 1979 Fall;11(3):293-301.
The most important variables in helmet test methods (headform, impact surface, velocity) were studied by systematically changing the test variables and measuring the effect of these changes on the output responses (peak acceleration and severity index) of helmeted headforms. The degree of correlation between variables was also measured. The metal headform yielded consistently higher results than the humanoid headform but the differences between the two were much greater during impacts at the back site. Also, correlation between humanoid and metal headforms was significantly higher for top impacts than for rear impacts. These discrepancies between top and rear impacts were attributed to difficulties in the neck mounting system with the humanoid headform which causes inordinate bending during impacts. The soft impact surface yielded lower responses than the hard surface for both headforms, correlations between soft and hard surfaces were high in all cases. A small change in impact velocity (4.5 to 5 m/sec) resulted in a substantially higher output response. Correlation between velocities were much lower for the back impact site than the top.
通过系统地改变测试变量并测量这些变化对戴头盔头型的输出响应(峰值加速度和严重程度指数)的影响,研究了头盔测试方法中最重要的变量(头型、撞击表面、速度)。还测量了变量之间的相关程度。金属头型产生的结果始终高于类人型头型,但在后部位置撞击时,两者之间的差异要大得多。此外,顶部撞击时类人型和金属头型之间的相关性明显高于后部撞击。顶部和后部撞击之间的这些差异归因于类人型头型颈部安装系统存在困难,这会导致撞击时过度弯曲。对于两种头型,柔软的撞击表面产生的响应都低于坚硬表面,柔软和坚硬表面之间的相关性在所有情况下都很高。撞击速度的微小变化(4.5至5米/秒)导致输出响应大幅提高。后部撞击部位速度之间的相关性远低于顶部。