Bishop P J, Norman R W, Kozey J W
Am J Sports Med. 1984 May-Jun;12(3):233-6. doi: 10.1177/036354658401200313.
The impact attenuating characteristics of a sample of 81 football helmets used in competitive high school programs were determined using a Hodgson-Wayne State University (WSU) headform and a modified National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) test protocol. The helmets, classified by liner type as suspension (37), padded-suspension (22), and padded (22) had been in use for 6 to 8 years. Each was subjected to two consecutive right rear boss impacts from a drop height of 1.5 m, onto a rigid anvil covered with a 45 durometer hardness rubber pad. Analogue signals from a triaxial accelerometer located at the center of gravity of the headform were analogue to digital (A/D) converted at 6060.6 Hz and processed on a Hewlett Packard 9845B minicomputer to yield a resultant acceleration-time curve from which peak acceleration (gpeak) and the Gadd Severity Index (GSI) were determined. The mean gpeak was 205 g for helmets with suspension liners, 165 g for helmets with padded-suspension liners, and 156 g for helmets with padded liners. Twenty-four suspension helmets and five padded or padded-suspension helmets had GSI values greater than 1200. Using a criterion of GSI1500, the failure rate for suspension helmets was 19% compared to 2% for padded and padded-suspension helmets combined. If the criterion chosen was GSI1200, the failure rate for suspension helmets was 65% as opposed to 11% for the padded and padded-suspension helmets combined. Suspension helmets are decidedly inferior under impact conditions to the padded and padded-suspension helmets.
使用霍奇森-韦恩州立大学(WSU)头模和修改后的美国国家运动装备标准操作委员会(NOCSAE)测试协议,测定了81个用于高中竞技项目的橄榄球头盔样品的冲击衰减特性。这些头盔根据衬里类型分为悬挂式(37个)、衬垫悬挂式(22个)和衬垫式(22个),已使用6至8年。每个头盔都从1.5米的跌落高度连续受到两次右后凸起冲击,冲击在覆盖有45硬度橡胶垫的刚性砧座上。位于头模重心处的三轴加速度计的模拟信号以6060.6赫兹进行模数(A/D)转换,并在惠普9845B小型计算机上进行处理,以生成合成加速度-时间曲线,从中确定峰值加速度(gpeak)和加德严重指数(GSI)。悬挂衬里头盔的平均gpeak为205克,衬垫悬挂衬里头盔为165克,衬垫衬里头盔为156克。24个悬挂式头盔和5个衬垫式或衬垫悬挂式头盔的GSI值大于1200。使用GSI1500的标准,悬挂式头盔的故障率为19%,而衬垫式和衬垫悬挂式头盔的综合故障率为2%。如果选择的标准是GSI1200,悬挂式头盔的故障率为65%,而衬垫式和衬垫悬挂式头盔的综合故障率为11%。在冲击条件下,悬挂式头盔明显不如衬垫式和衬垫悬挂式头盔。