Greendyke R M, Banzhaf J C, Inglis J
Transfusion. 1979 Nov-Dec;19(6):782-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1979.19680104110.x.
Six procedures for compatibility testing were compared, using red blood cells sensitized in normal saline, albumin or low-ionic strength saline (LISS) combined with either broad spectrum or anti-IgG antiglobulin testing (AGT). Despite shortened incubation times, tests employing LISS were as sensitive as those with albumin and broad spectrum AGT and more sensitive than the other four combinations. No false positive results were found. LISS technique with broad spectrum AGT appears to be suitable and superior for routine antibody detection and compatibility tests.
比较了六种相容性检测程序，使用在生理盐水、白蛋白或低离子强度盐水（LISS）中致敏的红细胞，并结合广谱或抗IgG抗球蛋白检测（AGT）。尽管孵育时间缩短，但采用LISS的检测与使用白蛋白和广谱AGT的检测一样敏感，且比其他四种组合更敏感。未发现假阳性结果。LISS技术结合广谱AGT似乎适用于常规抗体检测和相容性检测，且更为优越。
