• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对比度、成分持续时间以及以下强化程序。

Contrast, component duration, and the following schedule of reinforcement.

作者信息

Williams B A

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1979 Oct;5(4):379-96. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.5.4.379.

DOI:10.1037//0097-7403.5.4.379
PMID:528894
Abstract

Experiment 1 investigated component duration in a four-component multiple schedule designed to separate the effects of the preceding schedule of reinforcement from those of the following schedule of reinforcement. The preceding schedule in the preceding component had no consistent effect regardless of component duration. The following schedule was a powerful determinant of behavior, however, with higher response rates resulting from a following period of extinction. Moreover, the effect of the following schedule was greater with short component durations, which strongly suggests that component-duration effects previously found with multiple schedules are due generally to variation in the degree of control by the following schedule. Experiments 2--4 investigated the basis of the effects of the following schedule. In some situations differential responding in the following component was the controlling variable, but in others it was differential reinforcement in the following component. The results are consistent with the view that response rate during a stimulus is inversely related to the "value" of the following component, where the calculation of value must include both primary and conditioned reinforcement.

摘要

实验1在一个由四个部分组成的多重计划中研究了各部分的时长,该计划旨在将先前强化计划的效果与后续强化计划的效果区分开来。无论部分时长如何,前一部分中的先前计划都没有一致的效果。然而,后续计划是行为的一个有力决定因素,后续的消退期会导致更高的反应率。此外,部分时长较短时,后续计划的效果更大,这有力地表明,先前在多重计划中发现的部分时长效应通常是由于后续计划控制程度的变化所致。实验2至4研究了后续计划效果的基础。在某些情况下,后续部分的差异反应是控制变量,但在其他情况下,是后续部分的差异强化。结果与以下观点一致:刺激期间的反应率与后续部分的“价值”成反比,其中价值的计算必须包括初级强化和条件强化。

相似文献

1
Contrast, component duration, and the following schedule of reinforcement.对比度、成分持续时间以及以下强化程序。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1979 Oct;5(4):379-96. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.5.4.379.
2
Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?替代性强化增强对改变的抵抗力:巴甫洛夫式或操作性条件作用?
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):359-79. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-359.
3
Local contrast in multiple schedules: the effect of stimulus discriminability.多种时间表中的局部对比度:刺激可辨别性的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 May;39(3):427-35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-427.
4
Conditioned reinforcement versus time to reinforcement in chain schedules.连锁时间表中的条件强化与强化时间
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):381-93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-381.
5
Conditioned reinforcement value and resistance to change.条件强化值与改变阻力。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 May;89(3):263-98. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008-89-263.
6
Conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules when time to reinforcement is held constant.在强化时间保持不变的情况下,链型时间表中的条件强化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Mar;99(2):179-88. doi: 10.1002/jeab.10. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
7
Resistance to change of forgetting functions and response rates.遗忘功能和反应率的变化抗性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Jul;84(1):65-75. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.112-04.
8
The resistance to change of observing.观察的变革阻力。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Nov;80(3):273-93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.80-273.
9
A test of the melioration theory of matching.匹配的改善理论测试。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1989 Apr;15(2):99-113.
10
Effects of stimulus control and deprivation upon discriminative responding.刺激控制和剥夺对辨别性反应的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Mar;19(2):351-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-351.

引用本文的文献

1
Complex relationship between response rate and preference in pigeons: Williams (1992) revisited.鸽子反应率与偏好之间的复杂关系:重温威廉姆斯(1992年)的研究
Learn Behav. 2024 Dec 20. doi: 10.3758/s13420-024-00660-1.
2
The effects of chlordiazepoxide and d-amphetamine during a three-component multiple schedule.氯氮䓬和安非他命在三成分多重时间表期间的效果。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Jul;100(1):88-101. doi: 10.1002/jeab.28. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
3
Contrast and reallocation of extraneous reinforcers as a function of component duration and baseline rate of reinforcement.
作为组成部分持续时间和强化基线率的函数,外来强化物的对比和再分配。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Mar;63(2):203-24. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-203.
4
Choice between reliable and unreliable reinforcement alternatives revisited: Preference for unreliable reinforcement.重新审视可靠和不可靠强化物选择之间的关系:对不可靠强化物的偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):353-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-353.
5
Contrast and undermatching with regular or irregular alternation of components.与组件的规则或不规则交替进行对比和不匹配。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):407-16. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-407.
6
Momentary maximizing in concurrent schedules with a minimum interchangeover interval.具有最小交换间隔的同时性分配中的瞬间最大化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Sep;60(2):415-35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-415.
7
Behavioral contrast for key pecking as a function of component duration when only one component varies.仅一个成分变化时,关键啄食行为对比作为成分持续时间的函数。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Sep;60(2):331-43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-331.
8
Violations of transitivity: Implications for a theory of contextual choice.传递性的违背:对情境选择理论的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):185-201. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-185.
9
Contrast and reallocation of extraneous reinforcers between multiple-schedule components.多种时间表成分之间的额外增强物的对比和再分配。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Nov;58(3):497-511. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-497.
10
Inverse relations between preference and contrast.偏好与对比之间的反向关系。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Sep;58(2):303-12. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-303.