• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

S-R映射和反应方式对Stroop任务表现的影响。

Effects of S-R mapping and response modality on performance in a Stroop Task.

作者信息

Simon J R, Sudalaimuthu P

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 Feb;5(1):176-87. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.5.1.176.

DOI:10.1037//0096-1523.5.1.176
PMID:528927
Abstract

Forty subjects performed a choice reaction time task in which the stimulus was the word Red or Green printed in either red or green ink. Subjects responded verbally in one block of trials and by key pressing in another block. For one group, ink color was the relevant cue, and for another group, the word was the relevant cue. Half of the subjects in each group were instructed to make the response that corresponded to the relevant cue (compatible S-R [stimulus-response] mapping); the other half were instructed to make the response that did not correspond (incompatible S-R mapping). In general, subjects who performed under compatible S-R mapping instructions reacted faster when the irrelevant cue corresponded to the response than when it did not. In contrast, subjects show performed under incompatible S-R mapping instructions reacted faster when there was a lack of correspondence between the irrelevant cue and the response than when there was correspondence. Results were consistent with a notion of logical recoding; that is, that instructing subjects to recode the relevant cue into the alternate color may have caused them to recode the irrelevant cue in the same logical manner. Results might also be interpreted to suggest that the Stroop effect is related to congruence between the relevant and the irrelevant cues rather than to correspondence between the irrelevant cue and the response.

摘要

40名受试者完成了一项选择反应时任务,其中刺激物是用红色或绿色墨水打印的“红色”或“绿色”字样。受试者在一组试验中口头回答,在另一组试验中通过按键回答。对于一组,墨水颜色是相关线索;对于另一组,单词是相关线索。每组中有一半的受试者被指示做出与相关线索相对应的反应(兼容的刺激-反应[S-R]映射);另一半被指示做出不对应的反应(不兼容的S-R映射)。一般来说,在兼容的S-R映射指令下执行任务的受试者,当无关线索与反应相对应时比不对应时反应更快。相比之下,在不兼容的S-R映射指令下执行任务的受试者,当无关线索与反应不对应时比对应时反应更快。结果与逻辑重新编码的概念一致;也就是说,指示受试者将相关线索重新编码为另一种颜色可能导致他们以相同的逻辑方式对无关线索进行重新编码。结果也可能被解释为表明斯特鲁普效应与相关线索和无关线索之间的一致性有关,而不是与无关线索和反应之间的对应性有关。

相似文献

1
Effects of S-R mapping and response modality on performance in a Stroop Task.S-R映射和反应方式对Stroop任务表现的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 Feb;5(1):176-87. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.5.1.176.
2
Reaction time to word meaning and ink color of laterally-presented stroop stimuli: effects of handedness and sex.对侧向呈现的斯特鲁普刺激的词义和墨水颜色的反应时间:利手和性别的影响。
Int J Neurosci. 1985 Oct;28(1-2):21-33. doi: 10.3109/00207458509070816.
3
Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the 'Stroop effect' vs. the 'Simon effect'.冲突线索对信息处理的影响:“斯特鲁普效应”与“西蒙效应”。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1990 Mar;73(2):159-70. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90077-s.
4
Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.将无关位置维度作为相关刺激维度的函数进行处理。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Apr;20(2):286-98.
5
Logical recoding of S-R rules can reverse the effects of spatial S-R correspondence.S-R 规则的逻辑重新编码可以逆转空间 S-R 对应关系的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Feb;71(2):248-57. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.2.248.
6
Between-task transfer of learning from spatial compatibility to a color stroop task.从空间兼容性学习到颜色斯特鲁普任务的任务间学习迁移。
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(6):473-9. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000115.
7
The Stroop congruency effect is more observable under a speed strategy than an accuracy strategy.与准确性策略相比,在速度策略下,斯特鲁普一致性效应更明显。
Percept Mot Skills. 1991 Aug;73(1):67-76. doi: 10.2466/pms.1991.73.1.67.
8
Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding.非空间刺激-反应映射对 Simon 和 SNARC 效应的影响:任务间逻辑转换。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1239-54. doi: 10.1037/a0019239.
9
Display-control arrangement correspondence and logical recoding in the Hedge and Marsh reversal of the Simon effect.在西蒙效应的赫奇和马什反转中显示控制安排对应与逻辑重新编码。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2003 Mar;112(3):259-78. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00125-7.
10
Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks.处理无关位置信息:选择反应任务中的练习与迁移效应
Mem Cognit. 1999 Jan;27(1):63-77. doi: 10.3758/bf03201214.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing self-other distinction across motor, cognitive and affective domains.比较运动、认知和情感领域中的自我与他人区分。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Oct 9;11(10):240662. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240662. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.在任务切换中区分刺激-反应兼容性和模态兼容性
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1546-1562. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01276-4. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Oxygen: The Rate-Limiting Factor for Episodic Memory Performance, Even in Healthy Young Individuals.
氧气:即使在健康的年轻个体中,也是影响情景记忆表现的限速因素。
Biomolecules. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):1328. doi: 10.3390/biom10091328.
4
Pupillometric contributions to deciphering Stroop conflicts.瞳孔测量对解读 Stroop 冲突的贡献。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Feb;48(2):325-333. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00971-z.
5
Comparing Stroop-like and Simon Effects on Perceptual Features.比较 Stroop 样效应和 Simon 效应在知觉特征上的差异。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 19;7(1):17815. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18185-1.
6
A rose by any other name is still a rose: A reinterpretation of Hantsch and Mädebach.玫瑰易名,芬芳依旧:对汉奇和梅德巴赫观点的重新诠释
Lang Cogn Process. 2013;28(5):701-716. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.682071. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
7
A Reverse Stroop Task with Mouse Tracking.一项带有鼠标追踪的反向斯特鲁普任务。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 6;7:670. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00670. eCollection 2016.
8
The burden of embodied cognition.具身认知的负担
Can J Exp Psychol. 2015 Jun;69(2):172-8. doi: 10.1037/cep0000060.
9
Naming and categorizing objects: task differences modulate the polarity of semantic effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.命名和分类物体:任务差异调节图片-词汇干扰范式中语义效应的极性。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Jul;40(5):760-8. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0184-6.
10
Color-object interference in young children: A Stroop effect in children 3½-6½ years old.幼儿的颜色-物体干扰:3.5至6.5岁儿童的斯特鲁普效应。
Cogn Dev. 2005 Jun;20(2):256-278. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.04.001.