Arlinger S D
Scand Audiol. 1979;8(4):247-51. doi: 10.3109/01050397909076327.
Four laboratories participated in this study to compare ascending and bracketing methods in manual determination of hearing thresholds using attenuators with 5 dB step. In all, 214 ears were measured. No significant difference was found between mean thresholds obtained with the two methods in the frequency range 0.5--6 kHz; the four-laboratory, six-frequency grand mean difference was -0.31 dB. The variability among subjects also remained essentially the same for the two methods. However, the bracketing method required a significantly longer test time than the ascending method.
四个实验室参与了本研究,以比较在使用步长为5 dB的衰减器手动测定听力阈值时的升序法和括弧法。总共测量了214只耳朵。在0.5 - 6 kHz频率范围内,两种方法获得的平均阈值之间未发现显著差异;四个实验室、六个频率的总平均差异为-0.31 dB。两种方法在受试者之间的变异性也基本相同。然而,括弧法所需的测试时间明显长于升序法。