Suppr超能文献

纯音听力测试中升法和括弧法的比较。一项多实验室研究。

Comparison of ascending and bracketing methods in pure tone audiometry. A multi-laboratory study.

作者信息

Arlinger S D

出版信息

Scand Audiol. 1979;8(4):247-51. doi: 10.3109/01050397909076327.

Abstract

Four laboratories participated in this study to compare ascending and bracketing methods in manual determination of hearing thresholds using attenuators with 5 dB step. In all, 214 ears were measured. No significant difference was found between mean thresholds obtained with the two methods in the frequency range 0.5--6 kHz; the four-laboratory, six-frequency grand mean difference was -0.31 dB. The variability among subjects also remained essentially the same for the two methods. However, the bracketing method required a significantly longer test time than the ascending method.

摘要

四个实验室参与了本研究,以比较在使用步长为5 dB的衰减器手动测定听力阈值时的升序法和括弧法。总共测量了214只耳朵。在0.5 - 6 kHz频率范围内,两种方法获得的平均阈值之间未发现显著差异;四个实验室、六个频率的总平均差异为-0.31 dB。两种方法在受试者之间的变异性也基本相同。然而,括弧法所需的测试时间明显长于升序法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验