Suppr超能文献

志贺氏菌的分离。8. 木糖赖氨酸脱氧胆酸盐琼脂、赫氏肠道琼脂、沙门氏菌-志贺氏菌琼脂和伊红美蓝琼脂与粪便标本的比较。

Isolation of Shigellae. 8. Comparison of xylose lysine deoxycholate agar, hektoen enteric agar, Salmonella-Shigella agar, and eosin methylene blue agar with stool specimens.

作者信息

Taylor W I, Schelhart D

出版信息

Appl Microbiol. 1971 Jan;21(1):32-7. doi: 10.1128/am.21.1.32-37.1971.

Abstract

Two enrichment broths and four plating media were compared for efficiency of detection of enteric pathogens from 1,597 stool specimens. Of 170 salmonellae isolated from the composite of all methods, direct streaking yielded but 54%, whereas enrichment in gram-negative broth found 87% and Selenite-F broth 97%. By contrast, gram-negative broth produced 100% of the 17 shigellae, Selenite-F broth but 77%, and direct streaking only 59%. Thus, enrichment methods produced almost twice the number of both pathogens as direct streaking. Comparison of the plating media revealed xylose lysine deoxycholate agar (XLD) and Hektoen enteric agar to be equal in their abilities to find both pathogens. Both were moderately better than Salmonella-Shigella agar and markedly superior to eosin methylene blue agar. XLD fround 83% of salmonellae produced by the composite of four media and 90% of the shigellae. Hektoen enteric agar found 80% of both. Salmonella-Shigella agar detected 74 and 68%, respectively, and eosin methylene blue agar only 42 and 63%. The numbers of false positives accruing to each medium, however, showed Hektoen enteric and Salmonella-Shigella agars to produce more than twice as many false-positive plates as XLD. Similarly, Selenite-F broth resulted in many more false-positives for all plating media than did gram-negative broth. Consequently, the index of validity, which equates successful isolation of pathogens with total pickings, favored XLD and gram-negative broth as the media of choice, with direct streaking the poorest method by all counts.

摘要

比较了两种增菌肉汤和四种平板培养基从1597份粪便标本中检测肠道病原体的效率。在通过所有方法组合分离出的170株沙门氏菌中,直接划线法仅检出54%,而在革兰氏阴性肉汤中增菌检出87%,在亚硒酸盐-F肉汤中增菌检出97%。相比之下,革兰氏阴性肉汤检出了全部17株志贺氏菌,亚硒酸盐-F肉汤检出77%,直接划线法仅检出59%。因此,增菌法检出的两种病原体数量几乎是直接划线法的两倍。对平板培养基的比较显示,木糖赖氨酸脱氧胆酸盐琼脂(XLD)和赫氏肠道琼脂在检出两种病原体的能力上相当。两者都略优于沙门氏菌-志贺氏菌琼脂,且明显优于伊红美蓝琼脂。XLD检出了四种培养基组合检出的沙门氏菌的83%和志贺氏菌的90%。赫氏肠道琼脂检出了两者的80%。沙门氏菌-志贺氏菌琼脂分别检出74%和68%,伊红美蓝琼脂仅检出42%和63%。然而,每种培养基产生的假阳性数量显示,赫氏肠道琼脂和沙门氏菌-志贺氏菌琼脂产生的假阳性平板数量是XLD的两倍多。同样,亚硒酸盐-F肉汤对所有平板培养基产生的假阳性都比对革兰氏阴性肉汤多。因此,将病原体的成功分离与总挑选数等同的有效性指数表明,XLD和革兰氏阴性肉汤是首选培养基,而直接划线法在各方面都是最差的方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Comparison of media for the selective culture of enteroinvasive Escherichia coli.用于侵袭性大肠杆菌选择性培养的培养基比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003 Apr;22(4):235-41. doi: 10.1007/s10096-003-0908-4. Epub 2003 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验