Waters W E
Br Med J. 1971 Apr 10;2(5753):77-81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5753.77.
Groups of individuals with headache, unilateral headache, and migraine, and a fourth group who had not had a headache in the previous year, were identified by questionnaire from a random sample of adults in the general population. Intelligence and social class were assessed in about 400 individuals. There was no evidence that individuals with migraine were more intelligent or of higher social class. There was, however, a suggestion that the more intelligent individuals with migraine, and those in social classes I and II, were more likely to consult a doctor for their headaches. This trend might explain the origin of the hypotheses associating migraine with intelligence and with social class.Random samples of individuals with migraine with headache and without headache in the previous year were the probands for a family study. There were 524 first-degree relatives over 21 years of age who lived in South Wales. Headache histories, obtained "blindly" from over 99% of these relatives with a standard questionnaire, were classified as migraine, possible migraine, headache, or without headache in the previous year. The prevalence of migraine in the families of the migrainous probands was nearly twice as high as the prevalence in the other families, but this difference was not statistically significant. It is suggested that family history should not be included in the definition of migraine and that heredity is much less important in migraine than is usually supposed.
通过问卷调查从普通人群的成年人随机样本中识别出患有头痛、单侧头痛和偏头痛的人群组,以及第四组在过去一年中未患头痛的人群。对大约400人进行了智力和社会阶层评估。没有证据表明偏头痛患者更聪明或社会阶层更高。然而,有迹象表明,偏头痛患者中较聪明的人以及社会阶层I和II的人更有可能因头痛而咨询医生。这种趋势可能解释了将偏头痛与智力和社会阶层联系起来的假设的起源。
对前一年有头痛和无头痛的偏头痛患者的随机样本进行家族研究。有524名年龄超过21岁的一级亲属居住在南威尔士。使用标准问卷“盲目”从超过99%的这些亲属中获取头痛病史,并在前一年将其分类为偏头痛、可能的偏头痛、头痛或无头痛。偏头痛先证者家庭中偏头痛的患病率几乎是其他家庭患病率的两倍,但这种差异没有统计学意义。有人认为偏头痛的定义不应包括家族史,而且遗传在偏头痛中的重要性远低于通常的设想。