Nossal G J, Cunningham A, Mitchell G F, Miller J F
J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):839-53. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.839.
Two new methods are described for making chromosomal spreads of single antibody-forming cells. The first depends on the controlled rupture of cells in small microdroplets through the use of a mild detergent and application of a mechanical stress on the cell. The second is a microadaptation of the conventional Ford technique. Both methods have a success rate of over 50%, though the quality of chromosomal spreads obtained is generally not as good as with conventional methods. These techniques have been applied to an analysis of cell to cell interaction in adoptive immune responses, using the full syngeneic transfer system provided by the use of CBA and CBA/T6T6 donor-recipient combinations. When neonatally thymectomized mice were restored to adequate immune responsiveness to sheep erythrocytes by injections of either thymus cells or thoracic duct lymphocytes, it was shown that all the actual dividing antibody-forming cells were not of donor but of host origin. When lethally irradiated mice were injected with chromosomally marked but syngeneic mixtures of thymus and bone marrow cells, a rather feeble adoptive immune response ensued; all the antibody-forming cells identified were of bone marrow origin. When mixtures of bone marrow cells and thoracic duct lymphocytes were used, immune restoration was much more effective, and over three-quarters of the antibody-forming mitotic figures carried the bone marrow donor chromosomal marker. The results were deemed to be consistent with the conclusions derived in the previous paper of this series, namely that thymus contains some, but a small number only of antigen-reactive cells (ARC), bone marrow contains antibody-forming cell precursors (AFCP) but no ARC, and thoracic duct lymph contains both ARC and AFCP with a probable predominance of the former. A vigorous immune response to sheep erythrocytes probably requires a collaboration between the two cell lineages, involving proliferation first of the ARC and then of the AFCP. The results stressed that the use of large numbers of pure thoracic duct lymphocytes in adoptive transfer work could lead to good adoptive immune responses, but that such results should not be construed as evidence against cell collaboration hypotheses. Some possible further uses of single cell chromosome techniques were briefly discussed.
本文描述了两种制备单抗体形成细胞染色体铺片的新方法。第一种方法是通过使用温和的去污剂并对细胞施加机械应力,使细胞在微小液滴中可控破裂。第二种方法是对传统福特技术的微调整。两种方法的成功率均超过50%,不过所获得的染色体铺片质量通常不如传统方法。这些技术已应用于过继免疫反应中细胞间相互作用的分析,采用了CBA和CBA/T6T6供体 - 受体组合提供的完全同基因转移系统。当新生期胸腺切除的小鼠通过注射胸腺细胞或胸导管淋巴细胞恢复到对绵羊红细胞有足够的免疫反应性时,结果表明所有实际正在分裂的抗体形成细胞并非供体来源,而是宿主来源。当对致死性照射的小鼠注射染色体标记但同基因的胸腺和骨髓细胞混合物时,会产生相当微弱的过继免疫反应;所有鉴定出的抗体形成细胞均来自骨髓。当使用骨髓细胞和胸导管淋巴细胞的混合物时,免疫恢复更为有效,超过四分之三的抗体形成有丝分裂图像带有骨髓供体染色体标记。这些结果被认为与本系列前一篇论文得出的结论一致,即胸腺含有一些但数量很少的抗原反应性细胞(ARC),骨髓含有抗体形成细胞前体(AFCP)但不含ARC,胸导管淋巴含有ARC和AFCP,前者可能占优势。对绵羊红细胞的强烈免疫反应可能需要这两种细胞谱系之间的协作,首先是ARC增殖,然后是AFCP增殖。结果强调,在过继转移工作中使用大量纯胸导管淋巴细胞可导致良好的过继免疫反应,但不应将此类结果解释为反对细胞协作假说的证据。还简要讨论了单细胞染色体技术一些可能的进一步用途。