Orzalesi G, Selleri R, Caldini O, Volpato I, Innocenti F, Colome J, Sacristan A, Varez G
Arzneimittelforschung. 1977;27(5):1006-12.
The anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic effects and the tolerability of 2-(4-isobutylphenyl)-propionic acid (ibuprofen) were compared with those of its derivative 2-(4-isobutylphenyl)-propiohydroxamic acid (ibuproxam, Ibudros. Our experiments show that the interfering action of the two drugs with the reactive processes of the tibio-tarsic articulation, brought about by carrageenin, serotonin, dextrane and formalin is of the same intensity. Also, the analgesic activity is perfectly consistent with the antipyretic one. However, the tolerability of the two molecules is different; the acute toxicity is consistent in the case of the single parenteral administration and it differs in the case of a single or repeated oral treatment. When used under these conditions, ibuproxam is considerably less damaging to the gastroenteric tube than is ibuprofen. The hypothesis is put forth that the greater tolerability of ibuproxam is due to its pharmacokinetics: it is, as such, little or not toxic for the mucous membrane of the digestive apparatus, and it progressively releases ibuprofen, whose concentrations in the blood would remain below those levels that cause systemic lesions in the gastroenteric tract.
将2-(4-异丁基苯基)丙酸(布洛芬)及其衍生物2-(4-异丁基苯基)丙酰异羟肟酸(异丁苯丙酸,Ibudros)的抗炎、镇痛和解热作用以及耐受性进行了比较。我们的实验表明,这两种药物对由角叉菜胶、血清素、右旋糖酐和福尔马林引起的胫跗关节反应过程的干扰作用强度相同。此外,镇痛活性与解热活性完全一致。然而,这两种分子的耐受性不同;单次肠胃外给药时急性毒性一致,而单次或重复口服治疗时则不同。在这些条件下使用时,异丁苯丙酸对胃肠道的损害比布洛芬小得多。有人提出假说,异丁苯丙酸耐受性更强是由于其药代动力学:就其本身而言,它对消化器官的黏膜几乎无毒或无毒,并且它会逐渐释放布洛芬,其在血液中的浓度将保持在导致胃肠道系统性损伤的水平以下。