Suppr超能文献

拉贝洛尔、噻吗洛尔、哌唑嗪以及托拉洛尔与哌唑嗪联合用药的比较血流动力学效应

Comparative haemodynamic effects of labetalol, timolol, prazosin and the combination of tolamolol and prazosin.

作者信息

Lund-Johansen P

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;8(Suppl 2):107S-111S.

Abstract

Four groups of patients with previously untreated essential hypertension in WHO stage I were treated either with timolol ( = 16), or prazosin ( = 13) or prazosin plus tolamolol ( = 12), or labetalol ( = 15). Oxygen consumption, heart rate, cardiac output (Cardiogreen) and intraarterial brachial BP were recorded at rest in the supine and sitting position and during steady-state work at 50, 100 and 150 W before treatment and after 1 yr on drug therapy. All regimes induced significant decrease in arterial BP at rest as well as during exercise. BP reduction was achieved through different haemodynamic mechanisms. In the timolol group BP reduction was associated with a marked decrease in heart rate and cardiac output but no decrease in total peripheral resistance. In the prazosin group there was a significant decrease in total peripheral resistance at rest as well as during exercise. During exercise the cardiac index was higher than before treatment. In the groups treated with prazosin plus tolamolol or labetalol alone the changes were rather similar. There was a significant decrease in total peripheral resistance at rest, supine and during exercise. Heart rate was decreased, but much less than by the use of a pure β-blocker alone. Due to a compensatory increase in stroke volume, particularly during muscular exercise, the cardiac index was reduced much less than in the group treated with timolol. The results indicate that the haemodynamic long-term effects of labetalol differ from those seen after long-term therapy on prazosin or β-adrenoceptor blockers and resemble those seen after combined treatment with both α- and β-adrenoceptor blockers. The clinical significance of these differences is briefly discussed.

摘要

四组世界卫生组织I期未经治疗的原发性高血压患者分别接受了噻吗洛尔(n = 16)、哌唑嗪(n = 13)、哌唑嗪加托拉洛尔(n = 12)或拉贝洛尔(n = 15)治疗。在治疗前以及药物治疗1年后,分别记录了患者仰卧位和坐位静息状态下以及在50、100和150瓦稳态工作期间的耗氧量、心率、心输出量(Cardiogreen法)和肱动脉内血压。所有治疗方案均使静息及运动时的动脉血压显著降低。血压降低是通过不同的血流动力学机制实现的。在噻吗洛尔组,血压降低与心率和心输出量显著降低相关,但总外周阻力未降低。在哌唑嗪组,静息及运动时总外周阻力均显著降低。运动期间心脏指数高于治疗前。在哌唑嗪加托拉洛尔组或单独使用拉贝洛尔组,变化相当相似。静息、仰卧位及运动时总外周阻力均显著降低。心率降低,但比单独使用纯β受体阻滞剂时少得多。由于每搏输出量代偿性增加,尤其是在肌肉运动期间,心脏指数的降低比噻吗洛尔治疗组少得多。结果表明,拉贝洛尔的长期血流动力学效应与长期使用哌唑嗪或β肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂后的效应不同,类似于同时使用α和β肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂联合治疗后的效应。简要讨论了这些差异的临床意义。

相似文献

6
Haemodynamic effects of prazosin.哌唑嗪的血流动力学效应。
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1976 Dec;224(2):239-47.

引用本文的文献

4
Comparison of labetalol with other anti-hypertensive drugs.拉贝洛尔与其他抗高血压药物的比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982 Jun;13(1 Suppl):41S-47S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb01888.x.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验