Suppr超能文献

一种用于在宿主细胞中显示淋球菌及其他微生物的新技术的评估。

Evaluation of a new technique for the demonstration of gonococci and other micro-organisms in host cells.

作者信息

Sowter C, McGEE Z A

出版信息

J Clin Pathol. 1976 May;29(5):433-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.29.5.433.

Abstract

A method (Gram-MGPLG) for demonstrating micro-organisms was compared with Gram and four other known methods. Each method was tested on tissue infected with Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Neisseria gonorrhoeae, which were then fixed in Bouin's formol saline, formol sublimate, or Van de Grift solutions. Gram-positive organisms in tissues were easily seen even at low magnification when stained by several of the methods tested. Gram-negative organisms, however, are very difficult to locate when stained by Gram's method because tissue components and the organisms are all shades of red, whereas the Gram-MGPLG provided easier location of organisms because these are stained red while the nuclei are blue and connective tissue is green. All methods are markedly affected by fixation; better preservation of cytological detail and improved staining reactions were produced by fixative containing mercuric chloride.

摘要

一种用于显示微生物的方法(革兰氏-镁绿孔雀绿法,Gram-MGPLG)与革兰氏法及其他四种已知方法进行了比较。每种方法都在感染了金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌或淋病奈瑟菌的组织上进行了测试,这些组织随后用布安氏甲醛盐水、升汞甲醛或范德格里夫特溶液固定。当用几种测试方法染色时,即使在低倍镜下,组织中的革兰氏阳性菌也很容易看到。然而,用革兰氏法染色时,革兰氏阴性菌很难定位,因为组织成分和细菌都是红色调,而革兰氏-镁绿孔雀绿法能更轻松地定位细菌,因为细菌被染成红色,而细胞核是蓝色,结缔组织是绿色。所有方法都受到固定的显著影响;含汞固定剂能更好地保存细胞学细节并改善染色反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验