Nevin J A, Shettleworth S J
J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):305-15. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-305.
Some phenomena of behavioral contrast in multiple schedules are reviewed, and three accounts of contrast are considered. Rate changes within a constant schedule component (transient contrasts) are distinguished from rate changes across successive schedule cycles (sustained contrasts). Pigeons were exposed to a three-component multiple schedule, in which a stimulus correlated with a constant variable interval schedule of reinforcement was preceded by a stimulus correlated with more frequent variable interval reinforcement, or by an extinction stimulus. If the preceding stimulus was correlated with more frequent reinforcement, the response rate in the constant component was low and increased with time. If the preceding stimulus was correlated with extinction, the rate in the constant component was high and decreased with time. Similar transient contrasts were observed in a two-component multiple schedule with different variable interval schedules in the two components. The transient contrast effects in the three-component schedule were shown to depend on differential reinforcement frequency rather than differential response rate in the preceding component. Such transient contrasts were not sufficient to account for sustained contrast effects observed in these experiments. The relation of these findings to the concepts of excitation and inhibition is discussed.
本文回顾了多重时间表中行为对比的一些现象,并考虑了三种对比解释。恒定时间表成分内的速率变化(瞬时对比)与连续时间表周期内的速率变化(持续对比)有所不同。鸽子被置于一个三成分多重时间表中,在与恒定可变间隔强化时间表相关的刺激之前,要么是与更频繁可变间隔强化相关的刺激,要么是消退刺激。如果前一个刺激与更频繁的强化相关,恒定成分中的反应速率较低且随时间增加。如果前一个刺激与消退相关,恒定成分中的速率较高且随时间降低。在一个两成分多重时间表中,两个成分具有不同的可变间隔时间表,也观察到了类似的瞬时对比。三成分时间表中的瞬时对比效应被证明取决于前一成分中的差异强化频率,而非差异反应速率。这种瞬时对比不足以解释这些实验中观察到的持续对比效应。本文还讨论了这些发现与兴奋和抑制概念的关系。