Williams M, Lahey B B
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1977 Dec;5(4):371-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00915085.
Kagan (1965a) developed the concepts of impulsive and reflective cognitive styles (conceptual tempo) to add a new dimension to the understanding and assessment of human intelligence. Although latency (the principal component of conceptual tempo) is negatively correlated with academic performance, it may not be necessary to modify latency in order to modify accuracy.. With 40 disadvantaged preschool children, it was found that reinforcing long latencies in choice tasks did not increase accuracy and vice versa, and that reinforcing both long latencies and accuracy was no more effective than reinforcing accuracy alone. These data were used to question the usefulness of the construct of conceptual tempo.
卡根(1965年a)提出了冲动型和反思型认知风格(概念节奏)的概念,为理解和评估人类智力增添了一个新维度。尽管反应时(概念节奏的主要成分)与学业成绩呈负相关,但可能没有必要为了提高准确性而改变反应时。对40名处境不利的学龄前儿童进行研究发现,在选择任务中强化长反应时并不会提高准确性,反之亦然,而且同时强化长反应时和准确性并不比单独强化准确性更有效。这些数据被用来质疑概念节奏这一概念结构的有用性。