Gonda M A, Kaminchick J, Oliff A, Menke J, Nagashima K, Scolnick E M
J Virol. 1984 Aug;51(2):306-14. doi: 10.1128/JVI.51.2.306-314.1984.
The pathogenic Friend virus complex is of considerable interest in that, although members of this group are genetically related, they differ markedly in biochemical and biological properties. Heteroduplex mapping of molecular clones of the Friend virus complex, which includes the replication-competent ecotropic Friend murine leukemia virus (F-MuLV) and mink cell focus-forming virus (F-MCF) and replication-defective polycythemia- and anemia-inducing strains of spleen focus-forming virus (SFFVp and SFFVa, respectively), was employed to provide insight into the molecular basis of their relationships. In heteroduplexes of F-MuLV X F-MCF, a major substitution of 0.89 kilobases in the env gene of F-MCF was discerned. Heteroduplexes of SFFVp X F-MuLV or F-MCF and SFFVa X F-MuLV or F-MCF showed several major deletions in the pol gene region and a single major deletion in the 3' half of the env gene region of SFFVp and SFFVa. A major substitution of 0.89 kilobases was mapped to the 5' end of the env deletion of SFFVp and SFFVa in heteroduplexes with F-MuLV, similar to that seen in F-MuLV X F-MCF heteroduplexes. In contrast, this env gene region was totally homologous in F-MCF X SFFVp or SFFVa and SFFVp X SFFVa heteroduplexes. Our results suggest that (i) both SFFVp and SFFVa lack part of the env gene at its 3' end, corresponding to the p15(E) coding region, (ii) major deletions occur in the pol and env genes which account for the replication defectiveness of SFFVp and SFFVa, (iii) minor substitutions occur in the gag gene region of SFFVa that are not present in SFFVp, F-MuLV, or F-MCF, (iv) a major substitution exists in the gp70 region of the env gene between F-MuLV and F-MCF that probably accounts for the differences in their host range specificities, (v) this substitution in F-MCF is identical to the gp70 part of the gp52 coding region of SFFVp and SFFVa, and (vi) heteroduplexes to F-MCF show unambiguously that no additional large substitutions are present in SFFVp or SFFVa that could account for differences in their leukemogenicity.
致病性弗氏病毒复合体备受关注,因为尽管该病毒组的成员在基因上相关,但它们在生化和生物学特性上却有显著差异。利用弗氏病毒复合体分子克隆的异源双链图谱分析,该复合体包括具有复制能力的亲嗜性弗氏小鼠白血病病毒(F-MuLV)和貂细胞集落形成病毒(F-MCF)以及复制缺陷型的分别诱导红细胞增多症和贫血的脾集落形成病毒株(分别为SFFVp和SFFVa),以深入了解它们之间关系的分子基础。在F-MuLV×F-MCF的异源双链体中,可识别出F-MCF的env基因中有一个0.89千碱基的主要替换。SFFVp×F-MuLV或F-MCF以及SFFVa×F-MuLV或F-MCF的异源双链体显示,在SFFVp和SFFVa的pol基因区域有几个主要缺失,env基因区域的3'端后半部分有一个主要缺失。在与F-MuLV的异源双链体中,一个0.89千碱基的主要替换被定位到SFFVp和SFFVa的env缺失的5'端,类似于在F-MuLV×F-MCF异源双链体中看到的情况。相比之下,在F-MCF×SFFVp或SFFVa以及SFFVp×SFFVa的异源双链体中,这个env基因区域是完全同源的。我们的结果表明:(i)SFFVp和SFFVa在其env基因的3'端都缺少一部分,对应于p15(E)编码区;(ii)pol和env基因中发生主要缺失,这解释了SFFVp和SFFVa的复制缺陷;(iii)SFFVa的gag基因区域存在一些SFFVp、F-MuLV或F-MCF中不存在的微小替换;(iv)F-MuLV和F-MCF的env基因的gp70区域存在一个主要替换,这可能解释了它们宿主范围特异性的差异;(v)F-MCF中的这个替换与SFFVp和SFFVa的gp52编码区的gp70部分相同;(vi)与F-MCF的异源双链体明确显示,SFFVp或SFFVa中不存在其他可能解释其致白血病性差异的大的替换。