Wilhelmsen K C, Eggleton K, Temin H M
J Virol. 1984 Oct;52(1):172-82. doi: 10.1128/JVI.52.1.172-182.1984.
Reticuloendotheliosis virus strain T (Rev-T) is a highly oncogenic replication-defective retrovirus which contains the oncogene v-rel. It is thought that Rev-T arose when a virus similar to Rev-A, the helper virus of Rev-T, infected a turkey and recombined with c-rel from that turkey. There is one large c-rel locus in the turkey genome which contains all of the sequences homologous to v-rel (K. C. Wilhelmsen and H. M. Temin, J. Virol. 49:521-529, 1984). We have sequenced v-rel and its flanking sequences, each of the regions of the c-rel locus from turkey that are homologous to v-rel and their flanking sequences, and the coding sequence for env and part of pol of Rev-A. The v-rel coding sequences can be translated into a 503-amino acid env-v-rel-out-of-frame-env fusion polypeptide. We have not detected any sequences in the Los Alamos or University of California-San Diego data bases that are more significantly related to the amino acid or nucleic acid sequence of v-rel than to the randomized sequence of v-rel. Comparison of Rev-A, Rev-T, and c-rel indicates that the v-rel sequences may have been transduced from the c-rel (turkey) locus by a novel mechanism. There are sequences in Rev-A and c-rel that are similar to splicing signals, indicating that the 5' virus-rel junction of Rev-T may have been formed by cellular RNA splicing machinery. Eight presumed introns have presumably been spliced out of c-rel to generate v-rel. There are also short imperfect regions of homology between sequences at the boundaries of v-rel and sequences in Rev-A and c-rel (turkey), indicating that c-rel may have been transduced by homologous recombination. There are many differences between the amino acid sequences of the predicted translational products of v-rel and c-rel which may account for their difference in transformation potential. These sequence differences between v-rel and c-rel include 10 missense transitions, four missense transversions, and three places where Rev-T has a small in-frame deletion of sequences relative to c-rel. Most of the coding sequence differences between c-rel and v-rel are nonconservative amino acid changes.
网状内皮组织增殖病病毒T株(Rev-T)是一种高度致癌的复制缺陷型逆转录病毒,含有癌基因v-rel。据认为,Rev-T是在一种类似于Rev-T的辅助病毒Rev-A感染火鸡并与该火鸡的c-rel重组时产生的。火鸡基因组中有一个大的c-rel基因座,其中包含所有与v-rel同源的序列(K.C.威廉姆森和H.M.特明,《病毒学杂志》49:521-529,1984年)。我们已经对v-rel及其侧翼序列、火鸡c-rel基因座中与v-rel同源的每个区域及其侧翼序列,以及Rev-A的env编码序列和部分pol编码序列进行了测序。v-rel编码序列可翻译成一个503个氨基酸的env-v-rel-移码-env融合多肽。我们在洛斯阿拉莫斯国家实验室或加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校的数据库中未检测到任何与v-rel的氨基酸或核酸序列比与v-rel的随机序列更显著相关的序列。Rev-A、Rev-T和c-rel的比较表明,v-rel序列可能是通过一种新机制从c-rel(火鸡)基因座转导而来的。Rev-A和c-rel中存在与剪接信号相似的序列,表明Rev-T的5'病毒-rel连接处可能是由细胞RNA剪接机制形成的。八个假定的内含子可能已从c-rel中剪接出来以产生v-rel。v-rel边界处的序列与Rev-A和c-rel(火鸡)中的序列之间也存在短的不完全同源区域,表明c-rel可能是通过同源重组转导的。v-rel和c-rel预测翻译产物的氨基酸序列之间存在许多差异,这可能解释了它们转化潜力的差异。v-rel和c-rel之间的这些序列差异包括10个错义转换、4个错义颠换,以及Rev-T相对于c-rel在三个位置有小的框内序列缺失。c-rel和v-rel之间的大多数编码序列差异是非保守氨基酸变化。