Suppr超能文献

Comparative study of treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea with thiamphenicol and cefotaxime.

作者信息

Notowicz A, Stolz E, van Klingeren B, van der Hoek J, de Hoop D, den Boer M S

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 1984 Oct-Dec;11(4 Suppl):379-81. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198410001-00016.

Abstract

Results of treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea caused by penicillinase- and non-penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae were compared. In The Hague treatment consisted of thiamphenicol (2.5 g given orally), whereas the treatment in Rotterdam was cefotaxime (1 g given im). All isolates were tested for production of penicillinase and sensitivity to cefotaxime and thiamphenicol. Special attention was given to possible hematological effects of treatments with thiamphenicol. Of 55 patients treated with thiamphenicol, 87.3% were cured; however, all of 55 patients treated with cefotaxime were cured. The frequency of postgonococcal urethritis among male patients was 34.1% after thiamphenicol and 39.5% after cefotaxime treatment. The only adverse effect seen after cefotaxime treatment was a rash (2%). After treatment with thiamphenicol, 10.9% of patients had diarrhea. No significant changes in hematologic tests were seen after treatment with thiamphenicol. There was a remarkable and significant difference in sensitivity to thiamphenicol between the two treatment groups; this fact could point to the importance of specific local factors in comparison of different treatments for gonorrhea.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验