May C D
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1976 Oct;58(4):500-15. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(76)90194-9.
Clinical and laboratory observations were made with 38 children afflicted with chronic severe asthma (reversible obstructive airway disease) in which hypersensitivity to food was incriminated in the histories. Symptoms were evoked in double-blind food challenges in only 11/38 children and 14/70 challenges, and were characteristic of immediate-type hypersensitivity and were chiefly gastrointestinal, even though asthma was the common presenting complaint. There were no delayed reactions. Peanut was responsible for 8 reactions, egg for 5, and cow's milk for 1. The feature that most successfully identified those having positive reactions in challenges was a significant wheal reaction in a skin test by puncture technique using a verified extract of 1:20 W/V concentration. No subject with clinically significant, symptomatic hypersensitivity to food had a negative puncture test, and puncture tests were positive in only 10/56 instances of negative reactions in food challenges. Laboratory observations included release of histamine and enzymes from leukocytes and the levels of neutrophil enzymes in serum before and after food provocation tests. While these determinations were of interest with respect to the immunochemical basis of reactions to foods, they did not prove useful for practical clinical diagnosis. The outstanding laboratory findings was the occurrence of "spontaneous" release of 25% to 100% of the histamine from leukocytes in all cases proved clinically hypersensitive by food challenges, which suggests that this may be an indicator of immediate-type hypersensitivity to food. From the findings in the study, a general approach to food hypersensitivity was developed in which the immunologic components coupled with quantitative concentration-response relationships serve to render comprehensible the distinction between asymptomatic (immunologic) hypersensitivity and symptomatic (clinical) hypersensitivity.
对38名患有慢性重度哮喘(可逆性阻塞性气道疾病)的儿童进行了临床和实验室观察,这些儿童的病史中均有食物过敏的嫌疑。在双盲食物激发试验中,只有11/38名儿童出现症状,共进行了70次激发试验,其中14次出现症状,症状为速发型过敏反应的特征,主要是胃肠道症状,尽管哮喘是常见的主诉。没有迟发性反应。花生引起8次反应,鸡蛋引起5次,牛奶引起1次。在激发试验中最能成功识别出有阳性反应者的特征是,使用经证实的1:20W/V浓度提取物,通过穿刺技术进行皮肤试验时出现明显的风团反应。没有临床上对食物有显著症状性过敏的受试者穿刺试验呈阴性,在食物激发试验的56次阴性反应中,穿刺试验仅10次呈阳性。实验室观察包括食物激发试验前后白细胞中组胺和酶的释放以及血清中中性粒细胞酶的水平。虽然这些测定对于食物反应的免疫化学基础很有意义,但它们对实际临床诊断并无帮助。突出的实验室发现是,在所有经食物激发试验临床证实过敏的病例中,白细胞中组胺“自发”释放了25%至100%,这表明这可能是对食物速发型过敏的一个指标。根据该研究的结果,制定了一种针对食物过敏的一般方法,其中免疫成分与定量浓度-反应关系有助于理解无症状(免疫性)过敏和有症状(临床)过敏之间的区别。