Schulz K F, Grimes D A, Cates W
Lancet. 1983 May 28;1(8335):1182-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92464-9.
Cervical injury is one of the most frequent complications of suction curettage abortion, yet little is known about its risk factors or prevention. In 15 438 suction curettage abortions carried out at less than or equal to 12 weeks' gestation in hospitals in the USA from 1975 to 1978 the incidence of cervical injury requiring suturing was 1.03 per 100 abortions. Among factors potentially within the physician's control, use of laminaria rather than rigid dilators for dilatation had a strong protective effect (relative risk 0.19), whereas performance of the abortion by a resident rather than an attending physician (relative risk 2.0) and use of general rather than local anaesthesia (relative risk 2.6) had detrimental effects on rates of cervical injury. Among other factors, a previous abortion had a protective effect (relative risk 0.46), whereas patient age less than or equal to 17 years had a detrimental effect (relative risk 1.9). Use of laminaria, performance of the abortion by an attending physician, and local anaesthesia together yield a 27-fold protective effect.
宫颈损伤是负压吸宫流产最常见的并发症之一,但其危险因素或预防措施却鲜为人知。在1975年至1978年美国医院进行的15438例妊娠12周及以内的负压吸宫流产中,需要缝合的宫颈损伤发生率为每100例流产1.03例。在医生可控制的潜在因素中,使用海藻棒而非刚性扩张器进行扩张具有很强的保护作用(相对风险0.19),而由住院医生而非主治医生进行流产(相对风险2.0)以及使用全身麻醉而非局部麻醉(相对风险2.6)对宫颈损伤发生率有不利影响。在其他因素中,既往流产有保护作用(相对风险0.46),而患者年龄小于或等于17岁有不利影响(相对风险1.9)。使用海藻棒、由主治医生进行流产以及局部麻醉共同产生27倍的保护作用。