Demellweek C, Goudie A J
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1983;80(4):287-307. doi: 10.1007/BF00432109.
An hypothesis is presented about the nature of behavioural tolerance in animals to stimulant drugs. It is suggested that, in many behavioural procedures, tolerance is due to behavioural adaptation to those drug effects which cause disruption of ongoing rewarded behaviour. This unitary hypothesis accounts for the available data on tolerance and cross-tolerance to stimulants more effectively than all of the other more conventional explanations which are based upon dispositional or functional concepts, the most common of which are described, evaluated, and found to be inadequate. Furthermore, it is suggested that attempts to explain tolerance in terms of changes in synaptic functioning are subject to very considerable problems of interpretation and that an analysis of behavioural mechanisms may be of greater value in understanding the process of behavioural tolerance. Evidence for the basic behavioural hypothesis is outlined in some detail, and a theoretical justification presented for its major assumptions. Operant studies of chronic stimulant effects on behaviour have often produced very complex patterns of data, considerable differences being reported both between subjects and between studies. A speculative model is presented which attempts to account for this pattern of data in tolerance studies.
提出了一个关于动物对兴奋剂药物行为耐受性本质的假说。有人认为,在许多行为程序中,耐受性是由于对那些导致正在进行的奖励行为中断的药物效应进行行为适应所致。与所有其他基于处置或功能概念的更传统解释相比,这个单一假说能更有效地解释关于兴奋剂耐受性和交叉耐受性的现有数据,文中描述、评估了其中最常见的传统解释,并发现它们并不充分。此外,有人认为,试图从突触功能变化的角度来解释耐受性会面临非常严重的解释问题,而对行为机制的分析在理解行为耐受性过程中可能更有价值。文中详细概述了基本行为假说的证据,并为其主要假设提供了理论依据。对慢性兴奋剂对行为影响的操作性研究常常产生非常复杂的数据模式,不同研究之间以及不同受试者之间都报告了相当大的差异。文中提出了一个推测性模型,试图解释耐受性研究中的这种数据模式。