Suppr超能文献

静脉输注生长抑素与血管加压素治疗急性静脉曲张出血的比较。

Comparison of intravenous somatostatin and vasopressin infusions in treatment of acute variceal hemorrhage.

作者信息

Kravetz D, Bosch J, Terés J, Bruix J, Rimola A, Rodés J

出版信息

Hepatology. 1984 May-Jun;4(3):442-6. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840040315.

Abstract

The present trial compared the effectiveness and complications of intravenous somatostatin and vasopressin in treatment of variceal bleeding. Sixty-one cirrhotic patients with endoscopically proven active variceal bleeding were included. Both drugs were given as continuous intravenous infusions for 48 hr. Thirty patients received somatostatin (250 micrograms per hr after a bolus of 50 micrograms) and 31 vasopressin (0.4 units per min). Initial control of bleeding was achieved in 26 (87%) patients receiving somatostatin and in 23 (74%) of those treated with vasopressin. However, 10 patients [not significant statistically] in the somatostatin group and 5 in the vasopressin group rebled during treatment, after a mean of 15 and 20 hr, respectively. Therefore, complete control of bleeding during the 48 hr of therapy was achieved in 16 (53%) patients treated with somatostatin and in 18 (58%) of those receiving vasopressin. Mortality during hospitalization was similar in both groups (somatostatin 47%, vasopressin 45%). Differences were observed in complications associated with each therapy. Vasopressin produced major complications in 8 patients (left ventricular failure in 4 and severe abdominal pain requiring drug withdrawal in 4), and minor complications in 14; somatostatin infusion produced minor complications in 3 patients (p less than 0.01). In addition, the serum sodium concentration was significantly reduced by vasopressin (from 134.3 +/- 1.6 to 128.3 +/- 1.4 mEq per liter, p less than 0.001) but not by somatostatin (134.6 +/- 1.1 vs. 133.2 +/- 1.1 mEq per liter). This study shows that somatostatin is as effective as vasopressin in controlling variceal hemorrhage, but has a much lower rate of complications.

摘要

本试验比较了静脉注射生长抑素和加压素治疗静脉曲张出血的有效性及并发症。纳入了61例经内镜证实有活动性静脉曲张出血的肝硬化患者。两种药物均持续静脉输注48小时。30例患者接受生长抑素治疗(首剂50微克后以每小时250微克的速度输注),31例接受加压素治疗(每分钟0.4单位)。接受生长抑素治疗的26例(87%)患者和接受加压素治疗的23例(74%)患者实现了出血的初始控制。然而,生长抑素组有10例患者[统计学上无显著差异]、加压素组有5例患者在治疗期间再次出血,平均分别在15小时和20小时后。因此,接受生长抑素治疗的16例(53%)患者和接受加压素治疗的18例(58%)患者在48小时治疗期间实现了出血的完全控制。两组住院期间的死亡率相似(生长抑素组47%,加压素组45%)。观察到每种治疗相关并发症存在差异。加压素导致8例患者出现严重并发症(4例左心室衰竭,4例因严重腹痛需要停药),14例出现轻微并发症;生长抑素输注导致3例患者出现轻微并发症(p<0.01)。此外,加压素使血清钠浓度显著降低(从134.3±1.6降至128.3±1.4毫当量/升,p<0.001),而生长抑素未使其降低(134.6±1.1对133.2±1.1毫当量/升)。本研究表明,生长抑素在控制静脉曲张出血方面与加压素同样有效,但并发症发生率低得多。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验