Suppr超能文献

自动体外除颤器的敏感性、准确性和安全性。

Sensitivity, accuracy, and safety of an automatic external defibrillator.

作者信息

Cummins R O, Eisenberg M, Bergner L, Murray J A

出版信息

Lancet. 1984 Aug 11;2(8398):318-20. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92688-6.

Abstract

An automatic external defibrillator (AED) was used by paramedics to detect ventricular fibrillation and deliver countershocks in 39 people with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. The AED identified and delivered at least 1 countershock to 13 of the 16 people in ventricular fibrillation (81% sensitivity). The AED responded correctly to all 21 of the non-ventricular-fibrillation rhythms (8 other electrical rhythms, 13 asystole) with no countershocks (100% specificity). In 2 patients the rhythm could not be assessed. The device caused no injuries to patients or personnel. The performance of the AED was also analysed by considering each 15 s segment of ventricular fibrillation as a separate challenge; the device delivered a countershock in 19 of 29 such segments (66%).

摘要

护理人员使用自动体外除颤器(AED)对39例院外心脏骤停患者进行室颤检测并实施电击除颤。AED对16例室颤患者中的13例识别并至少实施了1次电击除颤(敏感性81%)。AED对所有21种非室颤心律(8种其他电节律、13种心脏停搏)均正确识别且未实施电击除颤(特异性100%)。2例患者的心律无法评估。该设备未对患者或人员造成伤害。通过将室颤的每15秒时间段视为一个单独的挑战来分析AED的性能;在29个这样的时间段中,该设备在19个时间段实施了电击除颤(66%)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验