Adler B, Faine S, Yanagawa R
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Jul;12(1):7-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.1.7-9.1980.
F4 and TM antigens extracted from Leptospira interrogans serovars pomona, icterohaemorrhagiae, and copenhageni were compared by immunodiffusion, by hemagglutination inhibition, and by selective absorption of antisera. These data, together with previous information on the serological specificities of the two antigen preparations, suggest that F4 and TM are different antigens.
通过免疫扩散、血凝抑制以及抗血清的选择性吸收,对从波摩那型、出血性黄疸型和哥本哈根型问号钩端螺旋体血清型中提取的F4和TM抗原进行了比较。这些数据,连同之前关于这两种抗原制剂血清学特异性的信息,表明F4和TM是不同的抗原。