Suppr超能文献

淋病奈瑟菌血清学:通过协同凝集进行W抗原血清分组以及通过酶联免疫吸附测定进行蛋白I血清分型均能检测蛋白I抗原。

Serology of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: W-antigen serogrouping by coagglutination and protein I serotyping by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay both detect protein I antigens.

作者信息

Sandstrom E G, Knapp J S, Buchanan T B

出版信息

Infect Immun. 1982 Jan;35(1):229-39. doi: 10.1128/iai.35.1.229-239.1982.

Abstract

A total of 224 strains were serogrouped by coagglutination (COA) and serotyped by protein I enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Of these strains, 61 were from patients with disseminated gonococcal infection, 21 were from patients with pelvic inflammatory disease, and 115 were from patients with uncomplicated gonococcal infection in Singapore, the Philippines, and Denmark. Twenty-seven were laboratory reference strains. Of the patient strains, 102 belonged to COA serogroup WI, and all of the 100 strains that typed with protein I serotypes 1, 2, or 3 were in this group. Most of the strains of gonococci from the 61 patients with disseminated gonococcal infection were within this group (COA WI, 53 or 87%; protein I serotypes 1, 2, or 3, 51 or 84%). All 46 strains that were protein I serotypes 4 through 7 were also COA serogroup WII. Protein I serotypes 8 and 9 accounted for 49 (25%) of the 197 patient strains. Twenty-eight of these strains typed as COA serogroup WII, 20 typed as serogroup WIII, and 1 typed as serogroups WII and WIII. COA W serogrouping and protein I ELISA both appeared to detect antigens on the protein I molecule of the outer membrane of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Protein I serotyping, which uses unboiled organisms, may generally recognize more variable and surface-exposed antigenic determinants. In contrast, COA W serogrouping, which uses boiled organisms, may recognize less exposed shared antigenic determinants in addition to variable protein I antigenic determinants. Both methods may prove useful for further studies of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of gonorrhea.

摘要

共有224株菌株通过协同凝集(COA)进行血清群分型,并通过蛋白I酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)进行血清型分型。在这些菌株中,61株来自播散性淋球菌感染患者,21株来自盆腔炎患者,115株来自新加坡、菲律宾和丹麦的无并发症淋球菌感染患者。27株为实验室参考菌株。在患者菌株中,102株属于COA血清群WI,并且所有100株蛋白I血清型为1、2或3的菌株都在该组中。61例播散性淋球菌感染患者的大多数淋球菌菌株都在该组中(COA WI,53株或87%;蛋白I血清型1、2或3,51株或84%)。所有46株蛋白I血清型为4至7的菌株也都是COA血清群WII。蛋白I血清型8和9占197例患者菌株中的49株(25%)。其中28株分型为COA血清群WII,20株分型为血清群WIII,1株分型为血清群WII和WIII。COA W血清群分型和蛋白I ELISA似乎都能检测淋病奈瑟菌外膜蛋白I分子上的抗原。使用未煮沸菌的蛋白I血清分型通常可能识别更多可变且表面暴露的抗原决定簇。相比之下,使用煮沸菌的COA W血清群分型除了可变的蛋白I抗原决定簇外,可能识别较少暴露的共同抗原决定簇。这两种方法可能都对淋病的流行病学和发病机制的进一步研究有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/351020/60d35b587cdc/iai00153-0251-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验