Uriel J
Cancer Res. 1976 Nov;36(11 Pt. 2):4269-75.
The close relationship at the molecular level between cellular differentiation and neoplasia has been evidenced by the discovery in adult individuals of fetospecific antigens and fetal type isozymes associated with many spontaneous and experimentally induced malignant tumors. One question in relation with this finding is whether cancerous tumors develop from the differentiation of a tissue reserve of stem cells or by a process of retrodifferentiation, i.e., the nucleocytoplasmic stepwise reversion of cells toward stationary states with simplified structure and less information content. The question is not merely academic; elucidation of the nature of the target cells from which neoplastic growth emerges has obviously physiopathological and therapeutic implications. This contribution is an analysis of the nature and the mechanism of cellular retrodifferentiation and a discussion of its possible role in regeneration and metaplasia, as well as in neoplastic development. Throughout living systems, retrodifferentiation appears as a common adaptive process for the maintenance of cell integrity against deleterious agents of varied etiology (physical, chemical,and viral). While preserving the entire information encoded on its genome, cells undergoing retrodifferentiation lose morphological and functional complexity by virtue of a process of self-deletion of cytoplasmic structures and the transition to a more juvenile pattern of gene expression. This results in a progressive uniformization of originally distinct cell phenotypes and to a decrease of responsiveness to regulatory signals operational in adult cells. Retrodifferentiation is normally counterbalanced by a process of reontogeny that tends to restore the terminal phenotypes from where the reversion started. This explains why retrodifferentiation remains invariably associated to cell regeneration and tissue repair. There is an ever growing evidence that neoplastic transformation in vivo and in vitro is frequently preceded and/or accompanied by biochemical, morphological, and behavioral transitions characteristic of a cell undergoing retrodifferentiation. Contrary to what occurs in regenerating tissues, the "unbalanced" character of tumor-associated retrodifferentiation seems to be a property linked to cancer. The question arises why a unique mechanism of cell rejuvenation is in physiological conditions (regeneration), followed by a process of reontogeny, while in neoplasia the process remains incomplete or does not occur and leads to the emergence of a population of persistently dividing cells. It is to be hoped that a careful study of retrodifferentiation in physiological and tumoral models will help to distinguish that which in neoplastic development can be relevant to an adaptive cell behavior from that which might eventually be the result of specific or constitutive alterations.
细胞分化与肿瘤形成在分子水平上的密切关系已通过在成年个体中发现与许多自发和实验诱导的恶性肿瘤相关的胎儿特异性抗原和胎儿型同工酶得到证实。与这一发现相关的一个问题是,癌性肿瘤是由干细胞组织储备的分化形成,还是通过逆分化过程形成,即细胞的核质逐步逆转为结构简化、信息含量减少的静止状态。这个问题不仅仅是学术性的;阐明肿瘤生长所源自的靶细胞的性质显然具有生理病理学和治疗学意义。本文旨在分析细胞逆分化的性质和机制,并讨论其在再生、化生以及肿瘤发生发展中可能发挥的作用。在整个生命系统中,逆分化似乎是一种常见的适应性过程,用于维持细胞完整性以抵御各种病因(物理、化学和病毒)的有害因子。在保留基因组上编码的全部信息的同时,经历逆分化的细胞通过细胞质结构的自我删除过程以及向更幼稚的基因表达模式转变,失去了形态和功能的复杂性。这导致原本不同的细胞表型逐渐趋于一致,并降低了对成年细胞中起作用的调节信号的反应性。逆分化通常会被一个重新发育的过程所平衡,该过程倾向于从逆转开始的地方恢复终末表型。这就解释了为什么逆分化总是与细胞再生和组织修复相关。越来越多的证据表明,体内和体外的肿瘤转化常常先于和/或伴随着细胞逆分化所特有的生化、形态和行为转变。与再生组织中发生的情况相反,肿瘤相关逆分化的“不平衡”特征似乎是与癌症相关的一种特性。问题在于,为什么在生理条件下(再生)一种独特的细胞年轻化机制之后会跟着一个重新发育的过程,而在肿瘤形成过程中这个过程仍然不完整或不发生,并导致一群持续分裂的细胞出现。希望对生理和肿瘤模型中的逆分化进行仔细研究,将有助于区分肿瘤发生发展中与适应性细胞行为相关的因素和最终可能是特定或组成性改变结果的因素。