• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格里菲斯心理发展量表的项目信度。

Item reliability for the Griffiths scales of mental development.

作者信息

Hanson R

出版信息

Child Care Health Dev. 1982 May-Jun;8(3):151-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1982.tb00278.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2214.1982.tb00278.x
PMID:6183018
Abstract

As a preliminary to the revision of the Griffiths scales, the 498 items constituting the original test were studied in terms of inter-observer agreement over the scoring, using videotapes of tests, given to children aged from 2 months to 7 years, and large scoring panels. Fifty-seven items failed to be administered or scored adequately often. One hundred and twelve were found to be unreliable on one in three administrations and only 23 were unreliable on two of three administrations. Among items scored sufficiently often, 88% of all administrations were reliable. Subscale differences were not as expected since the locomotor, personal--social and hearing and speech scales fared no worse than hand--eye coordination. Inter-observer agreement varied with the age of the children. Subscale weaknesses were examined in terms of the age ranges most concerned.

摘要

作为修订格里菲斯量表的前期工作,我们使用给2个月至7岁儿童进行测试的录像带以及大型评分小组,从评分的观察者间一致性角度,对构成原始测试的498个项目进行了研究。57个项目经常未能得到充分施测或评分。发现112个项目在三分之一的施测中不可靠,只有23个项目在三分之二的施测中不可靠。在施测次数足够多的项目中,所有施测的88%是可靠的。分量表差异并不如预期,因为运动、个人-社会以及听力和言语量表的表现并不比手眼协调量表差。观察者间一致性随儿童年龄而异。根据最相关的年龄范围对分量表的弱点进行了检查。

相似文献

1
Item reliability for the Griffiths scales of mental development.格里菲斯心理发展量表的项目信度。
Child Care Health Dev. 1982 May-Jun;8(3):151-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1982.tb00278.x.
2
Use of the Griffiths Mental Scales in normal 2 year old Malaysian children.在马来西亚正常2岁儿童中使用格里菲斯心理量表。
Med J Malaysia. 2001 Sep;56(3):331-5.
3
Comparison of Griffiths-II and Bayley-II tests for the developmental assessment of high-risk infants.用于高危婴儿发育评估的格里菲斯智力量表第二版与贝利婴幼儿发展量表第二版的比较。
Infant Behav Dev. 2015 Nov;41:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
4
Correlation of hearing screening with developmental outcomes in infants over a 2-year period.2年内婴儿听力筛查与发育结局的相关性
Acta Otolaryngol. 2007 Apr;127(4):384-8. doi: 10.1080/00016480601075431.
5
Development of a new screening tool for neuromotor development in children aged two - the neuromotor 5 min exam 2-year-old version (N5E2).一种针对两岁儿童神经运动发育的新型筛查工具——神经运动5分钟检查2岁版(N5E2)的开发。
Brain Dev. 2018 Jun;40(6):445-451. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
Achievement of infants on items of the Griffiths scales: 1980 compared with 1950.1980年与1950年相比,婴儿在格里菲斯量表各项上的成绩。
Child Care Health Dev. 1985 Mar-Apr;11(2):91-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1985.tb00454.x.
7
Some reasons for disagreement among scorers of infant intelligence test items.婴儿智力测试项目评分者之间存在分歧的一些原因。
Child Care Health Dev. 1984 Jan-Feb;10(1):17-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1984.tb00163.x.
8
Achievements of young children on items of the Griffiths scales: 1980 compared with 1960.1980年与1960年相比,幼儿在格里菲斯量表各项上的成绩。
Child Care Health Dev. 1987 May-Jun;13(3):181-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1987.tb00535.x.
9
Denver developmental screening test and preterm infants.丹佛发育筛查测验与早产儿
Arch Dis Child. 1985 Jan;60(1):20-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.60.1.20.
10
The relations between Griffiths scales assessments in the pre-school period and educational outcomes at 7+ years.学前阶段的格里菲斯量表评估与7岁以上儿童教育成果之间的关系。
Child Care Health Dev. 1993 Jul-Aug;19(4):275-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1993.tb00733.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Multisensory stimulation bundles on sleep and neurobehavioral development in the first year after birth in very preterm infants: a randomized crossover controlled study protocol.多感官刺激对早产儿出生后第一年睡眠和神经行为发育的影响:一项随机交叉对照研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Nov 15;24(1):732. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07753-8.
2
Categorizing the cries of infants with ASD versus typically developing infants: A study of adult accuracy and reaction time.区分患有自闭症谱系障碍的婴儿与发育正常婴儿的哭声:一项关于成年人准确性和反应时间的研究。
Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2016 Nov;31:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
3
Three physiological responses in fathers and non-fathers' to vocalizations of typically developing infants and infants with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
父亲和非父亲对典型发育婴儿及自闭症谱系障碍婴儿发声的三种生理反应。
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Aug-Sep;43-44:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
4
Componential deconstruction of infant distress vocalizations via tree-based models: a study of cry in autism spectrum disorder and typical development.基于树的模型对婴儿痛苦哭声的成分解构:自闭症谱系障碍和典型发育中的哭声研究。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Sep;34(9):2717-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.05.036. Epub 2013 Jun 14.