Van Cangh P J, Opsomer R, De Nayer P
J Urol. 1982 Dec;128(6):1212-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53428-x.
A prospective study comparing a new radioimmunologic and a classical enzymatic assay for prostatic acid phosphatase was done to evaluate their respective roles in patients with prostatic diseases. We studied 50 patients with cancer of the prostate, 101 with benign prostatic hypertrophy and 17 with prostatitis as well as patients with nonprostatic malignancy, and various hematological and bone diseases. The results showed a low incidence of elevated values in patients with early cancer of the prostate and a high incidence of false positive values with the radioimmunoassay in patients with benign prostatic diseases, especially prostatitis. These data suggest that tests for serum prostatic acid phosphatase levels remain disappointing in the assessment of prostatic disease regardless of the technique used.
进行了一项前瞻性研究,比较一种新的放射免疫分析法和传统的酶分析法检测前列腺酸性磷酸酶,以评估它们在前列腺疾病患者中的各自作用。我们研究了50例前列腺癌患者、101例良性前列腺增生患者、17例前列腺炎患者以及患有非前列腺恶性肿瘤、各种血液系统疾病和骨疾病的患者。结果显示,前列腺癌早期患者中值升高的发生率较低,而在良性前列腺疾病患者(尤其是前列腺炎患者)中,放射免疫分析法的假阳性值发生率较高。这些数据表明,无论使用何种技术,血清前列腺酸性磷酸酶水平检测在前列腺疾病评估中仍然令人失望。