Canal P, Soula G
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1982 Dec;30(10):833-6.
The radioimmunoassay of prostatic acid phosphatase and the measurement of L-tartrate labil acid phosphatase by biochemical technique are compared in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer. This study concerning in 122 patients bearing prostatic cancers (40), prostatic adenomas (30) and other solid tumors (52) shows that the sensibility of RIA technique is better than the biochemical one. The positive predictive value of PAP-RIA is 93 p. cent However, seeing that the percentage of positivity of RIA in intracapsular stages rarely exceeds 40 p. cent, this test does not allow to increase detection power of early stages. The RIA technique, if it is better than biochemical method will not be effective as a sole screening tool for prostatic cancer and its principal application consists in the follow-up of the therapy of prostatic cancer.
在前列腺癌的诊断中,对前列腺酸性磷酸酶的放射免疫测定法和通过生化技术测量L-酒石酸不稳定酸性磷酸酶进行了比较。这项针对122例患有前列腺癌(40例)、前列腺腺瘤(30例)和其他实体瘤(52例)患者的研究表明,放射免疫测定技术的敏感性优于生化技术。前列腺酸性磷酸酶放射免疫测定的阳性预测值为93%。然而,鉴于在包膜内阶段放射免疫测定的阳性率很少超过40%,该检测方法无法提高早期阶段的检测能力。放射免疫测定技术虽然比生化方法更好,但作为前列腺癌的唯一筛查工具并不有效,其主要应用在于前列腺癌治疗的随访。