• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新评估皮内试验在反应素性过敏诊断中的作用。

Reappraisal of intracutaneous tests in the diagnosis of reaginic allergy.

作者信息

Reddy P M, Nagaya H, Pascual H C, Lee S K, Gupta S, Lauridsen J I, Jerome D C

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1978 Jan;61(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(78)90471-2.

DOI:10.1016/0091-6749(78)90471-2
PMID:618945
Abstract

In an attempt to determine the clinical relevance of positive intracutaneous tests when epicutaneous tests are negative, 34 patients with symptoms of perennial rhinitis who had negative epicutaneous but positive intracutaneous tests were evaluated by radioallergosorbent (RAST) test, nasal provocation (NP) tests and leukocyte histamine release (LHR) assay. Nineteen patients with perennial rhinitis who had positive epicutaneous tests and 13 normal healthy volunteers were also studied as positive and negative controls, respectively. None of the 34 patients with negative epicutaneous but positive intracutaneous tests had positive RASTs or LHR assays, but 1 patient had a positive NP test. In contrast, of the 19 patients with positive epicutaneous tests, 12 patients had positive RASTs, 17 had positive LHR assays, and 17 had positive NP tests. In the negative control group of 13 subjects, none had positive RAST, LHR assays, or NP tests, although 3 subjects showed positive intracutaneous tests. These results indicate that when epicutaneous tests are negative in patients with perennial rhinitis, positive intracutaneous tests are not likely to indicate the presence of reaginic allergy.

摘要

为了确定皮上试验阴性时皮内试验阳性的临床相关性,对34例常年性鼻炎症状患者进行了评估,这些患者皮上试验阴性但皮内试验阳性,采用放射变应原吸附试验(RAST)、鼻激发试验(NP)和白细胞组胺释放试验(LHR)。19例皮上试验阳性的常年性鼻炎患者和13名正常健康志愿者分别作为阳性和阴性对照进行研究。34例皮上试验阴性但皮内试验阳性的患者中,无一例RAST或LHR试验呈阳性,但有1例患者鼻激发试验呈阳性。相比之下,19例皮上试验阳性的患者中,12例RAST试验呈阳性,17例LHR试验呈阳性,17例鼻激发试验呈阳性。在13名受试者的阴性对照组中,尽管有3名受试者皮内试验呈阳性,但无一例RAST、LHR试验或鼻激发试验呈阳性。这些结果表明,常年性鼻炎患者皮上试验阴性时,皮内试验阳性不太可能提示反应素性过敏的存在。

相似文献

1
Reappraisal of intracutaneous tests in the diagnosis of reaginic allergy.重新评估皮内试验在反应素性过敏诊断中的作用。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1978 Jan;61(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(78)90471-2.
2
RAST in the diagnosis of hypersensitivity to dog and cat allergens. A comparison of different extract preparations with clinical history, skin test and provocation tests.放射性变应原吸附试验在犬猫过敏原超敏反应诊断中的应用。不同提取物制剂与临床病史、皮肤试验及激发试验的比较
Clin Allergy. 1979 Mar;9(2):191-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1979.tb01541.x.
3
House dust allergy: correlation between in vivo and in vitro diagnostic tests.
Ann Allergy. 1981 Feb;46(2):100-4.
4
The diagnostic approach to immediate hypersensitivity in patients with allergic rhinitis; a comparison of nasal challenges and serum rast.变应性鼻炎患者速发型超敏反应的诊断方法;鼻激发试验与血清变应原特异性IgE检测的比较
Ann Allergy. 1983 Sep;51(3):395-400.
5
[Atopy screening: prick multitest, total IgE or RAST? On the value of allergologic testing of the staff of an industrial bakery].[特应性筛查:点刺多项试验、总IgE还是放射性变应原吸附试验?关于一家工业面包厂员工的变态反应学检测的价值]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1985 Apr 6;115(14):466-75.
6
[Determination of specific IgE serum antibodies using the Radio-Allergo-Sorbent-Test (RAST) and its significance for the diagnosis of atopic allergy].[采用放射变应原吸附试验(RAST)测定特异性IgE血清抗体及其在特应性过敏诊断中的意义]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1975 Oct 18;105(42):1337-45.
7
Comparison between intracutaneous and prick tests in detecting sensitizations to common Mediterranean allergens.
Respiration. 1980;40(6):317-22. doi: 10.1159/000194299.
8
Comparison of skin tests and RAST in the diagnosis of atopic hypersensitivity.皮肤试验与放射性变应原吸附试验在特应性超敏反应诊断中的比较。
Ann Allergy. 1976 Mar;36(3):161-4.
9
Discrepancies between the skin test and IgE antibody assays: study of histamine release, complement activation in vitro, and occurrence of allergen-specific IgG.皮肤试验与IgE抗体检测之间的差异:组胺释放、体外补体激活及变应原特异性IgG发生情况的研究
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1988 Aug;82(2):270-81. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(88)91011-1.
10
A comparison of skin prick tests, intradermal skin tests, and RASTs in the diagnosis of cat allergy.皮肤点刺试验、皮内皮肤试验和放射性变应原吸附试验在猫过敏诊断中的比较。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 May;103(5 Pt 1):773-9. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70419-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Allergic and Mixed Rhinitis: Diagnosis and Natural Evolution.变应性鼻炎和混合性鼻炎:诊断与自然病程
J Clin Med. 2019 Nov 19;8(11):2019. doi: 10.3390/jcm8112019.
2
International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis.国际过敏与鼻科学学会共识声明:变应性鼻炎。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Feb;8(2):108-352. doi: 10.1002/alr.22073.
3
Diagnostic methods to demonstrate igE antibodies: skin testing techniques.用于检测IgE抗体的诊断方法:皮肤试验技术。
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1981 Sep;57(7):524-48.
4
Skin testing for allergy in children.儿童过敏的皮肤测试。
Can Med Assoc J. 1983 Oct 15;129(8):828-30.
5
Conventional allergy tests.传统过敏测试。
Arch Dis Child. 1991 Mar;66(3):281-2. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.3.281.
6
Allergy skin testing: comparison of conventional and new techniques.变应性皮肤试验:传统技术与新技术的比较
Can Med Assoc J. 1979 Feb 3;120(3):330-2.