Wilson A P, Ford C H, Newman C E, Howell A
Br J Cancer. 1984 Jan;49(1):57-63. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1984.9.
In this study cell lines have been used to determine the level of correlation between three assays which are in use for in vitro prediction of human tumour chemosensitivity. The methods which were compared included a clonogenic assay, a monolayer assay and a short-term biochemical assay. The results indicated that the monolayer and clonogenic assays were either directly comparable or could be made comparable by reducing the drug exposure time in the monolayer assay. The biochemical assay also gave comparable results for 3 of the 5 drugs tested. It was concluded that although the 3 assays did not produce identical dose-response curves, the assays were equally valid when used for predictive testing because selection of cut-off points which were based on retrospective correlations between in vitro sensitivity data and response data, as established by other authors, compensated for differences in sensitivity between the assays.
在本研究中,已使用细胞系来确定三种用于体外预测人类肿瘤化学敏感性的检测方法之间的相关程度。所比较的方法包括克隆形成检测法、单层检测法和短期生化检测法。结果表明,单层检测法和克隆形成检测法要么可直接比较,要么通过缩短单层检测法中的药物暴露时间可使其具有可比性。对于所测试的5种药物中的3种,生化检测法也给出了可比的结果。得出的结论是,尽管这三种检测方法并未产生完全相同的剂量反应曲线,但当用于预测性检测时,这些检测方法同样有效,因为根据其他作者所确立的体外敏感性数据与反应数据之间的回顾性相关性来选择临界点,可弥补各检测方法之间敏感性的差异。