• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从堆栈概念的程序角度重新审视语义错误。

Semantic errors reconsidered in the procedural light of stack concepts.

作者信息

Deloche G, Seron X

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1984 Jan;21(1):59-71. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90036-1.

DOI:10.1016/0093-934x(84)90036-1
PMID:6199077
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the relevance of the stack concept in neuropsycholinguistics, a stack being a file with serially ordered elements. Number names (one, two, three, . . .) and the names of the days in the week may be viewed in this way. In a stack structure, any element is identified by two pieces of information: the particular stack to which it belongs and its position within that stack. Two experiments are reported that demonstrate a double dissociation. A deep dyslexic patient with agrammatism was found to sort stack elements on the basis of identity of position-within-stacks, while a fluent aphasic with semantic verbal paraphasias used another criterion, grouping together the items of the same stack. First revealed when handling number names, the two psycholinguistic procedures are also shown to be differentially operative with other linguistic material. Introducing the stack concept thus permits a procedural reinterpretation of some "semantic confusions," particularly but not exclusively those dealing with quantities.

摘要

本文的目的是证明堆栈概念在神经心理语言学中的相关性,堆栈是一个包含按顺序排列元素的文件。数字名称(一、二、三……)和一周中的日期名称都可以这样看待。在堆栈结构中,任何元素都由两条信息标识:它所属的特定堆栈以及它在该堆栈中的位置。本文报告了两项实验,证明了双重分离。发现一名患有语法缺失的深度阅读障碍患者根据堆栈内的位置相同对堆栈元素进行分类,而一名患有语义言语性错语的流利失语症患者则使用了另一个标准,将同一堆栈的项目归为一组。这两种心理语言学程序最初在处理数字名称时被发现,在处理其他语言材料时也显示出不同的作用。因此,引入堆栈概念允许对一些“语义混淆”进行程序性重新解释,特别是但不限于那些涉及数量的混淆。

相似文献

1
Semantic errors reconsidered in the procedural light of stack concepts.从堆栈概念的程序角度重新审视语义错误。
Brain Lang. 1984 Jan;21(1):59-71. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90036-1.
2
The effects of temporal and semantic conditions on the occurrence of the error response of perseveration in adult aphasics.
J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Jun;25(2):184-92. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2502.184.
3
Variations in aphasic language behaviors.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1988 May;53(2):115-24. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5302.115.
4
[Verbal and non-verbal aspects of semantic disintegration in aphasia (author's transl)].失语症中语义解体的言语和非言语方面(作者译)
Riv Patol Nerv Ment. 1976 Jun;97(3):142-59.
5
From three to 3: a differential analysis of skills in transcoding quantities between patients with Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia.从3到3:布罗卡失语症和韦尼克失语症患者在数量转码技能上的差异分析
Brain. 1982 Dec;105 (Pt 4):719-33. doi: 10.1093/brain/105.4.719.
6
[Acoustic and semantic disturbances of comprehension in aphasia].[失语症中听觉和语义理解障碍]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 1975 Sep;131(9):645-59.
7
Written discourse and acquired brain impairment: evaluation of structural and semantic features of personal letters from a Systemic Functional Linguistic perspective.书面语篇与后天性脑损伤:从系统功能语言学视角评估私人信件的结构和语义特征
Clin Linguist Phon. 2005 Apr-May;19(3):227-47. doi: 10.1080/02699200410001698652.
8
The semantic deficit in aphasia: the relationship between semantic errors in auditory comprehension and picture naming.失语症中的语义缺陷:听觉理解中的语义错误与图片命名之间的关系。
Neuropsychologia. 1984;22(4):409-26. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90036-8.
9
The relationship between type of naming error and semantic-lexical discrimination in aphasic patients.失语症患者命名错误类型与语义-词汇辨别之间的关系。
Cortex. 1981 Oct;17(3):401-10. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(81)80028-7.
10
The background of aphasic misnamings. A factor analysis of visual naming errors.失语症错名的背景。视觉命名错误的因素分析。
Acta Neurol Belg. 1985 Mar-Apr;85(2):110-22.

引用本文的文献

1
From 2 to two: an analysis of a transcoding process by means of neuropsychological evidence.从2到二:基于神经心理学证据对转码过程的分析。
J Psycholinguist Res. 1984 May;13(3):215-36. doi: 10.1007/BF01068464.