Melander A, Sartor G, Wåhlin E, Scherstén B, Bitzén P O
Br Med J. 1978 Jan 21;1(6106):142-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6106.142.
A selective and sensitive gas chromatographic technique was used to measure the steady-state serum concentrations of tolbutamide and chlorpropamide in 97 patients with maturity-onset diabetes mellitus who had been taking these drugs (37 tolbutamide, 60 chlorpropamide) for at least a year. No other antidiabetic agents had been given. The serum tolbutamide concentrations varied widely between the patients (from close to zero to 370 mumol/l (100 mug/ml)), yet the variation in dosage was only sixfold (0.5-3.9 g daily). The serum chlorpropamide concentrations varied even more widely (from close to zero to 882 mumol/l (244 mug/ml)), though the dosage variation was fourfold (125-500 mg daily). There was no systematic relation between dosage and serum concentrations of the drugs.Only 2 (5.4%) of the tolbutamide-treated patients and 10 (16.7%) of the chlorpropamide-treated patients had normal fasting blood glucose concentrations (below 5.5 mmol/l (99 mg/100 ml)), and fewer than half had values below 8.0 mmol/l (144 mg/100 ml). In most cases, therefore, the treatment was insufficient.There was no significant difference in mean fasting blood glucose concentrations between the two treatment groups. The mean steady-state concentration of chlorpropamide, however, was significantly higher than that of tolbutamide. Thus, contrary to common belief, the intrinsic activity of chlorpropamide is apparently not greater than that of tolbutamide. The alleged greater potency of chlorpropamide seems to be related wholly to kinetic differences, such as the less extensive metabolic degradation and slower elimination of the drug.We conclude that treatment with sulphonylureas in conventional dosage is far from optimal and that monitoring the concentrations of these drugs in the blood may help to improve their efficacy.
采用一种选择性高且灵敏的气相色谱技术,对97例成年型糖尿病患者服用甲苯磺丁脲和氯磺丙脲(37例服用甲苯磺丁脲,60例服用氯磺丙脲)至少一年后的稳态血清浓度进行了测定。这些患者未服用其他抗糖尿病药物。患者之间血清甲苯磺丁脲浓度差异很大(从接近零至370μmol/L(100μg/ml)),而剂量变化仅为6倍(每日0.5 - 3.9g)。血清氯磺丙脲浓度差异更大(从接近零至882μmol/L(244μg/ml)),尽管剂量变化为4倍(每日125 - 500mg)。药物剂量与血清浓度之间无系统关联。服用甲苯磺丁脲的患者中仅有2例(5.4%)空腹血糖浓度正常(低于5.5mmol/L(99mg/100ml)),服用氯磺丙脲的患者中有10例(16.7%)空腹血糖浓度正常,且不到一半患者的值低于8.0mmol/L(144mg/100ml)。因此,在大多数情况下,治疗并不充分。两个治疗组的平均空腹血糖浓度无显著差异。然而,氯磺丙脲的平均稳态浓度显著高于甲苯磺丁脲。因此,与普遍看法相反,氯磺丙脲的内在活性显然并不大于甲苯磺丁脲。氯磺丙脲所谓的更强效力似乎完全与动力学差异有关,比如药物代谢降解程度较低以及消除较慢。我们得出结论,常规剂量的磺脲类药物治疗远非最佳,监测这些药物在血液中的浓度可能有助于提高其疗效。