• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麦吉尔疼痛问卷因子结构的交叉验证

Cross-validation of the factor structure of the McGill Pain Questionnaire.

作者信息

Byrne Mary, Troy Ann, Bradley Laurence A, Marchisello Peter J, Geisinger Kurt F, Van der Heide Laurie H, Prieto Edward J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, N.Y. 10458, USA Section on Medical Psychology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. 27103, USA Hospital for Special Surgery, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York, N.Y. 10021 U.S.A.

出版信息

Pain. 1982 Jun;13(2):193-201. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(82)90029-X.

DOI:10.1016/0304-3959(82)90029-X
PMID:6214754
Abstract

Low back pain patients' responses to the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) were factor analyzed using the principal factor method and direct oblique rotation procedures. Four factors were extracted that accounted for 55% of the total variance. Coefficients of congruence were computed in order to relate the current factors with those extracted in a previous factor analytic investigation. The results provided positive evidence that the sensory pressure, evaluative, and affective-sensory factors that were previously identified are stable dimensions underlying the MPQ responses of low back pain patients. However, it is necessary to conduct further cross-validation studies using patients from a wide variety of treatment settings.

摘要

采用主因子法和直接斜交旋转程序,对下背痛患者对麦吉尔疼痛问卷(MPQ)的反应进行了因子分析。提取了四个因子,它们占总方差的55%。计算了一致性系数,以便将当前因子与先前因子分析研究中提取的因子联系起来。结果提供了积极的证据,表明先前确定的感觉压力、评价和情感感觉因子是下背痛患者MPQ反应的稳定维度。然而,有必要使用来自各种治疗环境的患者进行进一步的交叉验证研究。

相似文献

1
Cross-validation of the factor structure of the McGill Pain Questionnaire.麦吉尔疼痛问卷因子结构的交叉验证
Pain. 1982 Jun;13(2):193-201. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(82)90029-X.
2
The language of low back pain: factor structure of the McGill pain questionnaire.腰痛的语言:麦吉尔疼痛问卷的因子结构
Pain. 1980 Feb;8(1):11-19. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(80)90086-X.
3
FACTOR ANALYSES OF THE McGILL PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE (MPQ) IN ACUTE AND CHRONIC PAIN PATIENTS.急性和慢性疼痛患者中麦吉尔疼痛问卷(MPQ)的因素分析
Psychol Rep. 2015 Jun;116(3):797-820. doi: 10.2466/03.15.PR0.116k25w7. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
4
Principal dimensions of the pain experience and psychological disturbance in chronic low back pain patients.慢性下腰痛患者疼痛体验和心理障碍的主要维度。
Pain. 1981 Aug;11(1):85-92. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(81)90141-X.
5
Validation of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in acute low back pain.简式麦吉尔疼痛问卷-2(SF-MPQ-2)在急性下腰痛中的效度验证。
J Pain. 2015 Apr;16(4):357-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
6
Social influences on factored dimensions of the McGill Pain Questionnaire.社会因素对麦吉尔疼痛问卷各维度的影响。
J Psychosom Res. 1986;30(4):461-9. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(86)90085-1.
7
A comparison of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in chronic and acute pain.慢性疼痛与急性疼痛中麦吉尔疼痛问卷的比较。
Pain. 1982 Jun;13(2):185-192. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(82)90028-8.
8
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Korean version of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire with chronic pain patients: a comparison of alternative models.韩国版简式麦吉尔疼痛问卷对慢性疼痛患者的验证性因素分析:替代模型比较
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Feb 7;13:15. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0195-z.
9
The internal structure of the McGill pain questionnaire in dysmenorrhoea patients.痛经患者中麦吉尔疼痛问卷的内部结构。
Pain. 1979 Dec;7(3):353-358. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(79)90091-5.
10
The use of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in assessing arthritis pain.麦吉尔疼痛问卷在评估关节炎疼痛中的应用。
Pain. 1984 Jul;19(3):305-314. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90007-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Indirect Effects of Recalled Trauma Severity on Pain Ratings among People with Fibromyalgia: a Moderated Mediation Model.创伤后回忆严重程度对纤维肌痛患者疼痛评分的间接影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Behav Med. 2024 Jul-Sep;50(3):211-223. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2023.2196389. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
2
Effects of Complex Rehabilitation Program on Reducing Pain and Disability in Patients with Lumbar Disc Protrusion-Is Early Intervention the Best Recommendation?综合康复方案对减轻腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛及残疾的影响——早期干预是最佳建议吗?
J Pers Med. 2022 May 2;12(5):741. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050741.
3
Prognostics for pain in osteoarthritis: Do clinical measures predict pain after total joint replacement?
骨关节炎疼痛的预后:临床指标能否预测全膝关节置换术后的疼痛?
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 8;15(1):e0222370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222370. eCollection 2020.
4
Pain Quality by Location in Outpatients with Cancer.癌症门诊患者疼痛性质的部位差异
Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Oct;20(5):425-431. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
You get used to it, or do you: symptom length predicts less fibromyalgia physical impairment, but only for those with above-average self-efficacy.你习惯了,还是不适应:症状持续时间预示着较少的纤维肌痛身体损伤,但仅对那些自我效能感高于平均水平的人适用。
Psychol Health Med. 2019 Feb;24(2):207-220. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2018.1524152. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
6
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the PROMIS pain quality item bank.探索性和验证性因子分析 PROMIS 疼痛质量项目库。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):245-55. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0467-9. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
7
Differences in pain location, intensity, and quality by pain pattern in outpatients with cancer.癌症门诊患者按疼痛模式的疼痛位置、强度和性质的差异。
Cancer Nurs. 2011 May-Jun;34(3):228-37. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181faab63.
8
Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: problems and solutions.关节置换术后患者健康相关生活质量评估的挑战:问题与解决方案。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Feb;18(2):72-82.
9
Sleep disturbances in fibromyalgia syndrome: relationship to pain and depression.纤维肌痛综合征中的睡眠障碍:与疼痛及抑郁的关系。
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jul 15;59(7):961-7. doi: 10.1002/art.23828.
10
Sensory information can decrease cold-induced pain perception.感觉信息可以降低冷引起的疼痛感知。
J Athl Train. 1995 Oct;30(4):293-6.