Wright D N, Welch D F, Saxon B A, Clark S J, Matsen J M
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Sep;22(3):493-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.22.3.493.
Cefoperazone agar dilution minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) susceptibility results were compared with zones of inhibition produced by disk diffusion susceptibility testing. Disks containing 30, 50, 75, and 100 micrograms of cefoperazone were tested for purposes of regression line comparisons and error rate-bounded analysis. Results suggest that if the MIC equivalent of susceptibility is 32 micrograms/ml, either a 50-micrograms disk with zone sizes of susceptibility (S) greater than or equal to 15 mm and resistance (R) less than or equal to 12 mm or a 75-micrograms disk with zone sizes of S greater than or equal to 17 mm and R less than or equal to 14 mm may be appropriate. If the MIC equivalent of susceptibility is 64 micrograms/ml, this would dictate use of a 75-micrograms disk with zone sizes of S greater than or equal to 17 mm and R less than or equal to 12 mm. Disks containing either less than or equal to 30 or greater than or equal to 100 micrograms of cefoperazone did not adequately discriminate among susceptible and resistant bacterial strains at either the 32- or 64-micrograms/ml MIC equivalent.
将头孢哌酮琼脂稀释最低抑菌浓度(MIC)敏感性结果与纸片扩散法药敏试验产生的抑菌圈进行比较。对含30、50、75和100微克头孢哌酮的纸片进行检测,以进行回归线比较和误差率界限分析。结果表明,如果敏感性的MIC等效值为32微克/毫升,那么对于50微克的纸片,敏感性(S)抑菌圈大小大于或等于15毫米且耐药(R)抑菌圈大小小于或等于12毫米,或者对于75微克的纸片,S抑菌圈大小大于或等于17毫米且R抑菌圈大小小于或等于14毫米可能是合适的。如果敏感性的MIC等效值为64微克/毫升,这将表明应使用75微克的纸片,其S抑菌圈大小大于或等于17毫米且R抑菌圈大小小于或等于12毫米。含小于或等于30微克或大于或等于100微克头孢哌酮的纸片,在MIC等效值为32微克/毫升或64微克/毫升时,均不能充分区分敏感和耐药菌株。