Suppr超能文献

头孢噻肟:体外活性及纸片药敏试验的初步解释标准

Cefotaxime: in vitro activity and tentative interpretive standards for disk susceptibility testing.

作者信息

Fuchs P C, Barry A L, Thornsberry C, Jones R N, Gavan T L, Gerlach E H, Sommers H M

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Jul;18(1):88-93. doi: 10.1128/AAC.18.1.88.

Abstract

Tested against 9,412 recent clinical isolates, cefotaxime exhibited 8 to 64 times greater activity against the Enterobacteriaceae than did cephalothin and two to four times greater activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but only one-half to one-eighth the activity of cephalothin against staphylococci. Using 420 different clinical isolates, but with comparable minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions, disk diffusion-MIC regression analyses were performed, using 5- and 30-micrograms cefotaxime disks. Cefotaxime MIC susceptible and resistant breakpoints of less than or equal to 8 and greater than 32 micrograms/ml are tentatively proposed. Based on the MIC breakpoints, the data showed the best discrimination among the three susceptibility categories (susceptible, indeterminate, and resistant) when the 30-micrograms cefotaxime disk was used. The zone diameter breakpoints as determined by the error rate-bounded method and regression analysis were greater than or equal to 23 mm for susceptible, 15 to 22 mm for indeterminate, and less than or equal to 14 mm for resistant.

摘要

在对9412株近期临床分离菌进行的测试中,头孢噻肟对肠杆菌科细菌的活性比头孢噻吩高8至64倍,对铜绿假单胞菌的活性高2至4倍,但对葡萄球菌的活性仅为头孢噻吩的二分之一至八分之一。使用420株不同的临床分离菌,但具有可比的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)分布,使用5微克和30微克的头孢噻肟纸片进行纸片扩散-MIC回归分析。初步提出头孢噻肟MIC敏感和耐药断点分别为小于或等于8微克/毫升和大于32微克/毫升。基于MIC断点,数据显示当使用30微克头孢噻肟纸片时,在三种敏感类别(敏感、不确定和耐药)之间的区分效果最佳。通过错误率限定法和回归分析确定的抑菌圈直径断点为:敏感≥23毫米,不确定为15至22毫米,耐药≤14毫米。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验