• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发性咽痛病史作为扁桃体切除术的指征。无记录病史的预测局限性。

History of recurrent sore throat as an indication for tonsillectomy. Predictive limitations of histories that are undocumented.

作者信息

Paradise J L, Bluestone C D, Bachman R Z, Karantonis G, Smith I H, Saez C A, Colborn K, Bernard B S, Taylor F H, Schwarzbach R H, Felder H, Stool S E, Fitz A M, Rogers K D

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1978 Feb 23;298(8):409-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197802232980801.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM197802232980801
PMID:622117
Abstract

As part of a prospective study of indications for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, we followed closely 65 children with histories of recurrent throat infection that seemed impressive (at least seven episodes in one year, five in each of two consecutive years or three in each of three consecutive years), but lacked documentation. During the first year of observation, only 11 children (17 per cent) had episodes of throat infection with clinical features and patterns of frequency conforming to those described in their presenting histories. Of the remaining 54 children, 43 (80 per cent) experienced no, one or two observed episodes each, and most of the episodes were mild. We conclude that undocumented histories of recurrent throat infection do not validly forecast subsequent experience and hence do not constitute an adequate basis for subjecting children to tonsillectomy.

摘要

作为一项关于扁桃体切除术和腺样体切除术适应证的前瞻性研究的一部分,我们密切跟踪了65名有复发性咽喉感染病史的儿童,这些病史看似严重(一年中至少发作7次,连续两年中每年发作5次或连续三年中每年发作3次),但缺乏相关记录。在观察的第一年,只有11名儿童(17%)出现了咽喉感染发作,其临床特征和发作频率模式与他们就诊时所述的相符。在其余54名儿童中,43名(80%)每人经历了0次、1次或2次观察到的发作,并且大多数发作都很轻微。我们得出结论,无记录的复发性咽喉感染病史不能有效预测后续情况,因此不能构成让儿童接受扁桃体切除术的充分依据。

相似文献

1
History of recurrent sore throat as an indication for tonsillectomy. Predictive limitations of histories that are undocumented.复发性咽痛病史作为扁桃体切除术的指征。无记录病史的预测局限性。
N Engl J Med. 1978 Feb 23;298(8):409-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197802232980801.
2
Efficacy of tonsillectomy for recurrent throat infection in severely affected children. Results of parallel randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials.扁桃体切除术对重症患儿复发性咽喉感染的疗效。平行随机和非随机临床试验结果。
N Engl J Med. 1984 Mar 15;310(11):674-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198403153101102.
3
Tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy for recurrent throat infection in moderately affected children.对中度受影响儿童进行扁桃体切除术和腺样体扁桃体切除术以治疗复发性咽喉感染。
Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 1):7-15. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.1.7.
4
Efficacy of tonsillectomy in treatment of recurrent group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis.扁桃体切除术治疗复发性A组β溶血性链球菌咽炎的疗效
Laryngoscope. 2006 Nov;116(11):1946-50. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000241958.58787.ab.
5
[The treatment of acute recurrent pharyngotonsillitis].[急性复发性咽扁桃体炎的治疗]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2006 Oct;26(5 Suppl 84):5-29.
6
[Acute recurrent pharyngotonsillitis and otitis media].[急性复发性咽扁桃体炎和中耳炎]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2006 Oct;26(5 Suppl 84):30-55.
7
Sore throats and tonsillectomy.
N Engl J Med. 1978 Feb 23;298(8):453-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197802232980811.
8
Alterations of the oropharyngeal microbial flora after adenotonsillectomy in children: a randomized controlled trial.儿童腺样体扁桃体切除术后口咽微生物群的变化:一项随机对照试验
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;133(10):969-72. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.10.969.
9
Tonsillectomy or adeno-tonsillectomy versus non-surgical treatment for chronic/recurrent acute tonsillitis.扁桃体切除术或腺样体扁桃体切除术与慢性/复发性急性扁桃体炎的非手术治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD001802. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001802.pub2.
10
Prospective surveillance of streptococcal sore throat in a tropical country.热带国家链球菌性咽喉炎的前瞻性监测。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Jun;28(6):477-82. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318194b2af.

引用本文的文献

1
Tonsillitis, tonsillectomy, and deep neck space infections in England: the case for a new guideline for surgical and non-surgical management.英国的扁桃体炎、扁桃体切除术和深部颈间隙感染:制定手术和非手术治疗新指南的理由。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Mar;103(3):208-217. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7030.
2
Incidence of indications for tonsillectomy and frequency of evidence-based surgery: a 12-year retrospective cohort study of primary care electronic records.扁桃体切除术适应证的发生率和基于证据的手术频率:初级保健电子记录的 12 年回顾性队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jan;69(678):e33-e41. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X699833. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
3
Indications for tonsillectomy stratified by the level of evidence.
根据证据水平分层的扁桃体切除术适应症。
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec 15;15:Doc09. doi: 10.3205/cto000136. eCollection 2016.
4
Tonsillectomy as prevention and treatment of sleep-disordered breathing: a report of 23 cases.扁桃体切除术作为睡眠呼吸障碍的防治:23例报告
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Nov 25;38(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40902-016-0092-y. eCollection 2016 Dec.
5
Tonsillitis and sore throat in children.儿童扁桃体炎和咽喉痛
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Dec 1;13:Doc07. doi: 10.3205/cto000110. eCollection 2014.
6
Sore throat - a review of presentation and etiology.喉咙痛——临床表现与病因综述。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Jan;56(1):14-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02968764.
7
URIs in children.儿童上呼吸道感染
Can Fam Physician. 1979 Jan;25:20-3.
8
Protocol for north of England and Scotland study of tonsillectomy and adeno-tonsillectomy in children (NESSTAC). A pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing surgical intervention with conventional medical treatment in children with recurrent sore throats.英格兰北部和苏格兰儿童扁桃体切除术及腺样体扁桃体切除术研究方案(NESSTAC)。一项实用的随机对照试验,比较复发性喉咙痛儿童手术干预与传统药物治疗的效果。
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2006 Aug 9;6:13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6815-6-13.
9
A review of tonsillectomy for recurrent throat infection.复发性咽喉感染扁桃体切除术综述
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Jun;48(431):1331-5.
10
Continual observation of clinical and immunological parameters, in particular of salivary IgA, in tonsillectomised children.对扁桃体切除术后儿童的临床和免疫学参数,尤其是唾液免疫球蛋白A进行持续观察。
Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1980;226(1-2):73-84. doi: 10.1007/BF00455405.